Current is a scalar quantity, is it converted to vector quantity using Clarke's transformation? If it is correct, I would like to know how transformation converts from scalar to vector?

Thanks and best regards

  • \$\begingroup\$ No. Current is a scalar, but current in a coil in a motor is a vector dependent on the coil's orientation. \$\endgroup\$ Jul 31 '21 at 13:09

See also:

Leblanc's theorem: A coil supplied with a current (ti ) = I 2 cos(ωt) creates a field \$H(vector) = Hm*cos(w*t)*ux\$ (vector). which is equivalent to the sum of two fields of modulus Hm/2 rotating in opposite directions at the angular velocity ω.

Ferraris theorem: three windings evenly spaced in the plane and powered by sinusoidal currents of pulsation ω and forming a balanced system make it possible to create a field rotating at the speed ω.

We can consider that the current is a scalar quantity originally, even if in time, we can have a qualification of "complex" number and therefore also "vector" in time.

If we speak of a current of 1 A, we do not generally attribute to it a "geometric sense" (a direction in space).

However, if we consider that the magnetic field created in a coil by a current (mechanical element) is "axial" in the coil, one thus finds oneself in a certain "mechanical configuration" according to the position of the assembly of this one in space and one can then consider that the current has a "geometric" qualification ... therefore "vector" (x, y, z, or angular ...) in the broad sense of the term. This is the case with three-phase machines where the 3 coils create a "rotating" magnetic field in "space" and in "time".

This "rotating" field can be described in many different ways ... hence the various types of "vector transformations".


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.