About schematic A:
- It is more complete.
- It's easer to read.
- Component labelling is better, except for R101/R104.
- It contains a resistor (12kΩ) to hold the gate voltage low in the absence of an input connection.
- Resistor R101 (10kΩ) is way too large. It should probably be more like 100Ω. I would agree with 10kΩ if this were a biploar junction transistor. If the circuit is simply switching a fan on or off every few seconds, then this resistor isn't necessary at all.
- I would question the use of a schottkey diode. A regular rectifier diode would be fine.
- If such a thing is useful, it contains a correctly implemented indicator LED to show the switch state.
- It's really difficult to find information on the ES3400 MOSFET. I can't tell if it's appropriate in this application.
For schematic B:
I believe half the peripheral components are missing from this cutout, but in the spirit of "what you see is what you get":
- It's very difficult to read. I had to spend a lot of time to figure out where things like the fan should go.
- There's nothing to prevent the gate from floating.
- The MOSFET was easy to research, and well suited.
- I have no idea what SDDET means, but that LED has no companion resistor.
- There's no diode to protect the MOSFET (and everything else) from the motor. Perhaps that's what the LED does, there's no way to tell.
Verdict
The winner, for me, is A. At least I know it will work.
By the way, in response to your comment about the diode protecting the fan from reverse polarity, I have this to say: that diode is not to protect the fan/motor - it's to protect everything else from the fan/motor.