0
\$\begingroup\$

I'm designing a PCB with a ESP32-PICO-V3, with a RF output to a 50 Ohms U.FL (Micro-Coax) connector. The chip supports WiFi and Bluetooth in the frequency range 2.45 +/- 0.45 GHz.

Right now, I have a prototype with a 0 Ohms resistor in lieu of the CLC filter suggested in the Hardware Design Guidelines (pdf), which also states that the output impedance of the chip is ~(30 + 10j) Ohms (for the 6x6mm package, I have the 7x7), and I get 45 Mbps with iPerf test.

However, I'd like to improve the circuit with a true LC Balun filter. According to this site (and a few others), I get the following design::enter image description here.

I'm wondering: how do I route the plane under the RF trace with this type of connection to ground? I currently have the following layout:enter image description here.

My guess is that it will work however I do it, since it already works with no filter or matching. But I want to minimize EMI right from the start. Otherwise, should I just follow the guideline of putting a CLC filter and be done with it?

Other info: the stackup is Er = 4.05 and height = 3.5 mils. Traces are 6 mils wide.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ The u.fl coax connector is for an unbalanced line, and the chip has an unbalanced antenna pin. Why do you want a balun? You just need a conventional impedance matching network. \$\endgroup\$ Oct 11 at 4:51
  • \$\begingroup\$ Ah! It seems I had the concepts of impedance matching and line balancing mixed up. If I got this correctly, a balun can also include impedance matching, but need not do so. Since my input and output are both unbalanced, I only need the impedance matching part. So the CLC Pi matching circuit is the way to go. Thank you! \$\endgroup\$
    – Quantumal
    Oct 11 at 5:19
0
\$\begingroup\$

As Mark Leavitt commented, both the chip and connectors are unbalanced lines, so a balun (balanced-to-unbalanced) is not what I need here, although it can also include an impedance matching function. I only need the functionality of a CLC Pi matching circuit... just as the Hardware Design Guide suggests!

It seems EEWeb provides a nice calculator for this case, which is faster than re-learning the contents of Microwave and RF Wireless Systems by David M. Pozar

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.