5
\$\begingroup\$

I have designed a fixed 12 volt boost converter module and it works.

I tried to implement the same booster on my project PCB, but with all same components it can't provide 12 volts when it gets any load at output. I tried to bypass the onboard boost converter and attached the module I designed (same mentioned first) and it works with load too.

All the components as well as trace's width seem to be capable of handling the load. I tried to find what is different but I could not see anything.

Now the only thing left is isolation. Is it possible that some traces in my PCB can cause problem here? All boost converter components are on top layer but on bottom layer there is dome switch mounted on the PCB and another power grid along with data lines. The inductor I used is not shielded.

The schematic and PCB for the boost converter part is below. I used an MT3608 IC, the capacitor on input output is 22uF. Inductor part number CD54NP-330LC

enter image description here

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
16
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ the devil is in the details. Don't talk about your pcb - post a picture. Same with the schematic. \$\endgroup\$
    – Kartman
    Nov 18, 2021 at 13:29
  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ Not providing a schematic is just not an option on many, many EE questions. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Nov 18, 2021 at 13:29
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Inductor part number and data sheet link please. Also what is the input voltage and, have you monitored that input voltage to see that it remains stable when you hit problems? \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Nov 18, 2021 at 13:42
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ The PCB layout looks suspicious. Is that it, or is there a ground plane missing? \$\endgroup\$
    – Justme
    Nov 18, 2021 at 13:50
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ It does look a poorly designed PCB and the data sheet for the chip says the recommended maximum inductor value is 22 uH. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Nov 18, 2021 at 13:53

4 Answers 4

13
\$\begingroup\$

Here is a fragment from the datasheet you should have followed. As you can see, your PCB looks like someone was intentionally using every single recommendation backwards. Especially that pin 1 trace is outrageous. I suggest throwing your existing design out and starting from scratch.

One piece of advice that might help - don't rush to place components and start tracing. First, rotate and move components around to minimize rat's nest length as much as possible, and to reduce intersections - all the while keeping in mind specific requirements for important traces.

Layout considerations from datasheet

Note that while the layout suggested in the datasheet follows most of the rules, it is far from optimal. By placing components closer and with a bit of rotation here and there most of the traces can be shortened at least in half. The capacitors should be moved closer to the regulator pins (rules #1 and #3) and thermal VIAs added to GND (rule #2). Here is an example of such a rearrangement:

Tighter PCB layout

Another piece of advice, specific for power applications, is to keep in mind that CAD systems limit maximum possible trace width by local pin clearances. So, after making all required connections you have to supplement them with copper zones for current capacity and thermal dissipation. Alternatively, you can make all connections with copper zones only, making sure you switch their thermal clearance off.

Finally, as @Andyaka pointed out, the inductor you've used is not suitable. Again, it's as if somebody took the datasheet and did the opposite of what was written there.

excerpt from datasheet giving requirements for inductor

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Thank You for detailed answer. I will surely redesign this part again. It was my first time experience with critical circuits so far. I guess I need to read lot of designing rules here. \$\endgroup\$
    – dharmikP
    Nov 19, 2021 at 5:55
10
\$\begingroup\$

You have taken many liberties in this design especially on the layout but, I think a significant concern is something you inadvertently hinted at in the 2nd comment under the question: -

High current is also upto 500mA

So, you expect an output current up to 500 mA. That's at 12 volts hence, the input current into the booster is going to be a lot more that 500 mA. You say this in another comment: -

Input Voltage is 3.7volts (cell supplied) and output should be 12Volts.

So, making the assumption that power out is 90% of power in, it seems like your input supply current from the 3.7 volt battery will be about 1.8 amps.

Then you say that the input to the booster is controlled by a transistor and I see an FMMT720 BJT where the collector feeds your boost circuit. From the FMMT720 data-sheet I see this graph and on it I've redlined where 1.8 amps occurs: -

enter image description here

So, unless you are driving the base at a pretty good level the transistor will be dropping several hundred millivolts when supplying 1.8 amps. This means that the terminal voltage reaching your booster circuit is not 3.7 volts but maybe only 3.4 volts and that now means that your input current is required to be about 2 amps (to sustain the output load) and, that will drop even more voltage across the transistor and things will not end well (a downward spiral you could say).

But what about the inductor: -

enter image description here

It's only rated at 0.88 amps and that's a lot less than 1.8 amps. In addition, there is the maximum DC resistance of 0.23 Ω to consider. OK it's a max value but, typically it might be 0.2 Ω and, with 1.8 amps flowing, the DC volt drop is 0.36 volts and that another reduction in the input supply voltage. You might be realistically operating with an effective input voltage of only 3.0 volts and that requires an input current of over 2.2 amps to be able to supply a load of 500 mA on the 12 volt output. And also, the data sheet for the chip says the recommended maximum inductor value is 22 μH; yours is 33 μH.

In my opinion, that ain't gonna happen.

It's a perfect storm of wrong components, miscalculation and terrible PCB layout.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Soory I was away. There is misunderstanding related to current consumption. Total current consumed by PCB from source is upto 500mA. After boosted to 12Volts current required is very less (only 4 RGB LEDS actucally). By High Curent I didnt mean High side current, Sorry you had to go all over this. My bad. \$\endgroup\$
    – dharmikP
    Nov 19, 2021 at 5:46
3
\$\begingroup\$

Making the switching node long is to ask for trouble. Just look at how long the trace between IC pin-1 and the inductor is. You need to make this loop as small as possible. And you need to place the input capacitor(s) as close to the IC's input pin as possible.

Looking at the layout, I don't see any connection from the output capacitor (the one on bottom-left, right next to the big diode) to GND. Without any output capacitor, you can't get any regulated output when the output is loaded.

And you just kindly hid the GND pour for us to see the tracks clearly, didn't you? There's a proper GND pour, right?

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ That's not the only problem. The whole layout is a disaster. Not only is it missing a closed GND plane but all the traces are all over the place. They are long, thin and radiating. There are vias where no via should be! Not only will this be an EMI nightmare, the controller doesn't have a stable environment to work in. \$\endgroup\$ Nov 18, 2021 at 14:01
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @AttilaKinali You are right. Of course I'm aware of how a terrible PCB design that is, but I didn't have time to write down all the mistakes. Posted the biggest thing I saw only. \$\endgroup\$ Nov 18, 2021 at 14:24
0
\$\begingroup\$

I have redesigned the layout and changed the inductor to 22uH (shielded this time,) and it is working now. Attached layout design below if anyone is looking for a specific answer.

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.