0
\$\begingroup\$

In the datasheet of the "MC33887 5.0 A H-bridge with load current feedback" there is a section on "Output avalanche protection", in which it is explained that an inductive flyback event, namely when the outputs are suddenly disabled and V+ is lost, could result in electrical overstress of the drivers.

To prevent this, the V+ input to the 33887 should not exceed the maximum rating during a flyback condition. This may be done with either a Zener clamp and/or an appropriately valued input capacitor with sufficiently low ESR (as in the attached image.)

If the Zener diode is used and the V+ voltage must be 24V (VPWR in the attached image), what type of Zener diode could be used and with which breakdown voltage value?

MC33887 Output avalanche protection

\$\endgroup\$

2 Answers 2

1
\$\begingroup\$

The chip has internal MOSFETs with body diodes that will act as rectifiers, so when the motor acts as generator, or produces back-EMF, the energy will be sent into the power supply.

Protection measures depend on what kind of motor and mechanical load you have.

In any case, the input caps should have enough capacitance (and low ESL) to absorb the back-EMF, that is an energy of \$ 1/2 Li^2 \$ should only raise supply voltage by a small amount. This is usually the case if you have enough capacitance for the device to work correctly.

However, your motor has inertia, and if it moves a load, that has inertia too. If it lifts a load, then it can also act as a generator if the load goes down. This means the motor can generate a large amount of power and energy when it is used as a brake, either voluntary, or involuntary if the controller crashes or loses power. When this happens, capacitance on the input usually won't be enough to absorb the energy without voltage rising to dangerous levels.

A zener diode won't work because it is unable to dissipate enough power.

One popular solution for braking is to use the H-bridge to short the motor by turning on both bottom FETs. This dissipates the energy in the motor, which is presumably bulky enough and with good cooling. Basically, your controller monitors VPWR, and if it rises too much, it shorts the motor.

That way, even if the power supply is unconnected, if an external force spins the motor, it will act as a generator and power up the board via the VPWR rail. If the logic circuits on the board are powered from the motor voltage VPWR via a DC-DC converter, they will power up even if the power supply is disconnected. The controller should boot quickly enough to monitor the power supply and short the motor before supply voltage rises too much.

This can be implemented in a number of ways, software or hardware, for example with comparators. When power supply voltage is too low to turn on the MOSFETs properly, they should be off, and when voltage is too high, short the motor. I like the hardware solution because it's more relaxing to write and debug code on a board that won't blow up because all the protection features are in software and thus don't work when single-stepping code in the debugger.

If you want to dissipate the energy somewhere else that isn't the motor, then the usual solution is a hysteresis comparator on the supply voltage, that switches a MOSFET, that dissipates extra power in a resistor. This is more expensive, because the resistor needs to dissipate all the power the motor will generate when it is spun by an external force or by the load. But it will allow the motor to generate power into a higher voltage, which provides much stronger braking than just shorting it. So if you need the extra braking power, this is the way to go.

If it is battery powered, and the battery can take the power generated by the motor (mind the max charging current) then it can also be used as an energy sink. But you still need to have some protection in place for when the battery is fully charged and can't take any more current, so it's back to shorting the motor.

\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

If the Zener diode is used and the V+ voltage must be 24V (VPWR in the attached image), what type of Zener diode could be used and with which breakdown voltage value?

Well, if your supply is nominally 24 volts, it might naturally rise to a maximum that is 5% higher if it is a regulated supply. That means that the zener diode has to have a voltage rating greater than 1.05 x 24 volts = 25.2 volts. It has to be higher than this to prevent it taking large wasteful currents from the power supply.

Those wasteful currents over time could actually destroy the zener so, in these circumstances, I'd probably choose a 27 volt zener. Given that most Zener diodes have a 5% tolerance, the lowest expected zener voltage is 0.95 x 27 volts = 25.65 volts AND, this is higher than what a 5% tolerance 24 volt power supply can deliver.

But, using a 27 volt zener means that the highest voltage that can be seen on the power lines (when the motor is dumping energy back into the circuit) might be 1.05 x 27 volts = 28.35 volts. Then, you have to ask yourself the question whether 28.35 volts might be injurious to your H-bridge chip.

Regarding the zener power rating you have to be cautious and do a thorough tear-down of what injected energy the motor can back-feed into the power rails. Of course, a zener can only handle so much power over time before it pops so, I advise caution and I also advise that you make provision for MOSFET braking using two of the elements in the H-bridge (if possible).

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.