0
\$\begingroup\$

I have a stepper motor that is 42x42x60mm (width, length, height) and has a shaft in the front and back of the motor. This thing has finally given out and won't rotate even when powered down. But I cannot find a motor like this anywhere and this is on a $1000 3d printer.

So I am wondering could I replace this motor with 2 steppers back-to-back? I have to keep the stepper driver the same so is there a way to tie two motors into the same driver, like just by connecting the lines of the two motors? One major problem I forsee is that 2 steppers back-to-back will oppose each other for cw and ccw rotations.

\$\endgroup\$
5
  • \$\begingroup\$ won't rotate even when powered down maybe the bearings could be replaced \$\endgroup\$
    – jsotola
    Dec 7, 2021 at 17:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ Are you sure? Quick search found some options NEMA17 (ie 42mm x 42mm) and 60mm and dual shaft, in first page of Google results. Obv there are many motor specs to check, but I suspect the effort of getting a replacement part is less than reinventing. It's not that unusual a size. \$\endgroup\$
    – Pete W
    Dec 7, 2021 at 21:10
  • \$\begingroup\$ Also if you run two steppers in parallel it would pull more current, all things being equal, possibly affecting driver performance if it's designed to squeeze out a lot of performance. \$\endgroup\$
    – Pete W
    Dec 7, 2021 at 21:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ There are plenty of dual shaft stepper motors, the price is around 50 bucks for such. Question is, what is mounted on the other end, or why do you need a dual shaft? \$\endgroup\$ Dec 7, 2021 at 21:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ SF2424-10B11 see the price on Mouser. Extra you need a connecting cable /w connector 4835775-1 or DIY a connector with cable. \$\endgroup\$ Dec 7, 2021 at 22:02

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$

Put a shaft between two bearings with a gear and drive the gear from a new motor.

Make sure that the output matches the travel needed so the gearing may need to increase or decrease the motor output.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ This is an excellent idea, but I would much rather use 2 steppers if possible. It wouldn't require me to make new brackets among other changes. But if my question is not possible, this idea might save my printer \$\endgroup\$
    – Feynman137
    Dec 7, 2021 at 17:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.