I'm curious why didn't anybody mention partial fraction decomposition yet.
First of all, you have to keep in mind that \$\mathcal{F\{}\}\neq\mathcal{L\{}\}\$. The transfer function is defined as \$H(s):=\mathcal{L}\{h(t)\}=\mathcal{L}\{Y\{\delta(t)\}\}=\frac{\mathcal{L}\{y(t)\}}{\mathcal{L}\{u(t)\}}\$. What you have derived using the F-transform is another beast, I'm not sure about the correct English terminology of it, but it was called "transfer characteristic" in my (not English) course. You have \$H(j\omega)=\frac{\mathcal{F}\{y(t)\}}{\mathcal{F}\{u(t)\}}\$ In most well-behaved cases, the two are very similar, and could be used so, if you do a \$j\omega\Leftrightarrow s\$ substitution - but that only applies if the system is casual (so \$h(t<0)\equiv0\$), and the system is BIBO-stable (\$\int{h(t)dt}<\infty\$). Even then, you have to remember that \$\mathcal{F}\$ is used in periodic steady state analysis, and \$\mathcal{L}\$ is used with casual systems and if \$u(t<0)\equiv0\$ (again I can't find the correct English terminology, it was called "entering" signal on my course).
So all of that in mind, since your system can be considered as BIBO-stable and casual (BIBO-stable because it's only built from passives), you can swap \$H(j\omega)\$ for \$H(s)\$.
Your task is to find the impulse response. That can be done by inverse Laplace transforming \$H(s)\$. Your transfer function is not something you could inverse transform by hand (but tools like matlab, octave or mathematica can do it for you anyway), so in practical problems we usually do a partial fraction decomposition (waaay easier when we have numbers for \$R\$,\$L\$ or \$C\$, but still possible). For that, you could use the Heaviside cover-up method, but not necessary (and again, it works best when you have numbers).
From your transfer function, you'd get two fractional parts: \$\frac{A}{s-B}+\frac{A^*}{s-B^*}\$. From the table of \$\mathcal{L}\$, you can now inverse-transform them to be \$\varepsilon(t)(Ae^{(Bt)}+A^*e^{(B^* t)})\$. You can leave that in that form, but usually it's better to write \$A=|A|e^{j\phi}\$ and then separating the real and imaginary parts of \$B\$ to bring the result into a form of an entering damped sinusoid signal.