4
\$\begingroup\$

Hello community member,

I have a 4 layer PCB. At what data rate should I consider via back-drilling? Also do we back-drill 3 layer flex PCB? Thanks.

PCB Stackup

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ What does your signal integrity analysis tell you? \$\endgroup\$
    – SteveSh
    Commented Mar 3, 2022 at 19:14
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I think that if you have to ask the question, you may not have that problem. People don't just randomly design multi-gigabit data links without any prior experience and ask about via back-drilling. I'm almost certain you don't need to worry about any of that, and the layout of the traces themselves, and proper terminations, will have the only measurable effect on performance. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 3, 2022 at 20:52

1 Answer 1

8
\$\begingroup\$

For a 4-layer with signals on the outer layers, never. 3-layer flex… also never.

The whole point of back drilling is to remove stubs on the outer parts of vias, that if left undrilled, would cause reflections and thus degrade the signal. This would happen only on a via that connects to an inner layer. Vias to connections between outer layers do not have stubs.

Whether you need to back-drill or not depends entirely on the signal integrity goal you have for the signal on a particular via to an internal layer.

More here: https://resources.pcb.cadence.com/blog/backdrilling-in-pcb-manufacturing-2

You determine the need for stub removal based on physical simulation of your board. For a digital signal you use something like Hyperlynx; for an RF signal you’d use some other tool that does 2-d or 3-d field simulation.

That said, I’ve built many 6- and 8-layer boards using fast interfaces and RF and never saw the need to back-drill. I avoid the need to do that by routing critical signals on the outer layers only, preferably with no vias at all.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ OP - look at your stackup. The via goes from layer 1 to layer 4. So what would you back drill? Now if the via went from layer 1 to layer 2, that might be a different situation. \$\endgroup\$
    – SteveSh
    Commented Mar 3, 2022 at 19:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.