# Why do speakers use clamp connectors?

Why do many audio speakers use clamp terminals to connect speakers one to another, rather than jack connectors?

• ease of connection Apr 7 at 3:50
• @jsotola I'd say that jack connector is much easier to use. Apr 7 at 4:03
• not when your speaker wire is to be no longer than the distance between the amp and speaker ... it is a pain to tailor make cables Apr 7 at 6:11
• No one mentioned compatibility between different amplifiers with different speakers? Apr 7 at 15:17
• Professional audio uses sockets on the speakers and plugs on the cables. You just need a selection of cables depending on the size of the venue you're setting up in. Apr 7 at 21:05

### TL;DR Because that's good enough, so why do more.

If you used plugs/jacks of some sort then you would need to either have manufactured cables of an appropriate length (long enough, but not way too long) or make them yourself. However, some people may place their speakers a few feet from the audio source and others may place them 50 feet (15 m) or even farther away. Plus, if a long distance also involves going through walls, behind furniture, etc., it is much easier to get a thin speaker cable through than a cable with plugs on the ends. Consumer-grade speakers are extremely tolerant of varying cable and connection quality.

A similar situation, but with a different result, is computer networking. Typical computer networking these days is using some variant of twisted pair Ethernet. This involves cables with 8 wires (though depending on speed and other factors, often only 4 wires are used) instead of 2 wire, but the big difference is that the plugs and jacks need to be installed to a relatively high tolerance. Install them incorrectly and you get slower speed, errors or possibly no communication at all, despite having continuity on every wire end-to-end. As a result, the normal setup is to use manufactured cables or to install cables with jacks on each end, normally (but not required) mounted to walls/ceilings/floors, and then use manufactured cables to connect from those jacks to devices (computers, printers, routers, switches, etc.). With Ethernet, it is not too hard to learn how to install jacks, and the basic tools are inexpensive. But installing plugs on the end of cables, while possible, is not easy or inexpensive to do, or at least to do very well.

Speakers just need to reproduce a low frequency signal - on the order of 20 kHz. Bare wires jammed into spring-loaded connections are good enough. More will cost more, but it provide little benefit except, maybe, to audiophiles. Ethernet started at 10 megabit/sec and has progressed to the gigabit/sec range. It needs the high quality of properly installed plugs and jacks to get the signal through. Audio simply doesn't need that.

• Are you saying crimping RJ45's is difficult and expensive? It's neither... Apr 7 at 4:44
• Doing it well takes good tools and practice. I wouldn't recommend it for most people unless they'll be doing it a lot. Apr 7 at 4:46
• I think that the effort of making your own Ethernet cables is clearly above that of making speaker cables (with or without banana plugs). For a start, many will not even appreciate the need for care with the Ethernet connections. Apr 7 at 12:51
• @TypeIA Is it particularly difficult? No. But even then, when I was testing sockets in a (then) new apartment, literally none of the sockets have been wired correctly. Even today (not a professional network engineer) after doing dozens of cables, it's not exactly rare for me to have to redo the connectors because they aren't done well enough for 1 Gbit. Again, the point is - compare this to "plug two bare wires into a clamp". Connectors are great if connects and disconnects are relatively common, and changing wire/cable length is relatively rare. For connecting speakers to each other... Apr 7 at 13:00
• @TypeIA But it's cheaper and easier to use bare-end wires and clamps. So that's $20, extra cost of connectors, extra cost of unit, demos and trial runs which are all money and time down the drain. You're better to set light to a$20 note, then at least you've saved yourself the time. :) Apr 7 at 15:52

Spring clip speaker terminals are economical and dispense with the need for mating connectors on speaker cables.

All that they require is cable ends stripped of insulation for easy 'clip-on' / 'clip-off'.

They also permit the use of thicker cables.

• I'm imagining attaching some connector to a 4mm^2 copper cable. You'd probably need a blowtorch for that.
– arne
Apr 8 at 21:08

Speakers tend to be fitted to the wall. Jacks take a lot of space, clamps rarely protrude beyond the body of the speaker. This is especially valuable when you consider that you usually want to orient speakers towards the listeners, which usually means being mounted high up, and slightly tilted downwards.

They're also cheaper.

Note that other pieces of audio equipment do use various connectors, like jacks and cinches. They don't have the same limitations as speakers - and indeed, jacks and cinches do appear often enough with free-standing speakers, including computer speakers. It's also only useful when the connectors are standardised - perfectly fine with computers or walkmen, but not so much for restaurants or clubs. And then you get someone like Apple breaking off even those tentative standards.

Are they harder to use? Honestly, not at all. It's just that you're looking at their use from a different perspective than how they're actually used. With a headset, you expect to connect and disconnect the device often; jacks make perfect sense. They are more durable and less prone to causal misuse. But speakers are often installed more or less permanently, and then you also tend to make wires to length - and I'm sure you can appreciate how much easier it is to simply plug the stripped wire ends to a clamp than it is to attach a jack.

Cables are less flexible and more expensive than wires. Why use them when wires (for this application) tend to be more beneficial in the first place?

Cheap speakers generally use this type of connectors, which are ideal in this application.

The user will probably want to hide the cables, or string them behind shelves or thread them through small openings and conduits, and a large connector would prevent that. These binding posts allow use of any lamp cord, and the user can cut it to length, replace it, and change the color of the cable to hide it... It is also thin, so the speaker can be placed against a wall without a connector protruding. Contact is pretty good and reliable because the wire is squeezed between the contacts by a spring. Basically, these are cheap and they do the job very well. For this application, you don't want connectors.

The only big drawback is you really have to remember to turn the amp off when fiddling with the wires, because they will probably short while you do so.

More "high-end" speakers use posts like this:

If you get high-end speakers, you won't put them against the wall, because that makes the bass response ridiculously bad, so protruding connectors are less of a problem. That said, these binding posts are garbage when used with bare wire, because speakers vibrate, so they unscrew over time. The screw part is useless, and they're only reliable when used with banana jacks. So, ironically, the "high-end" gold-plated stuff is worse than the cheapo springy binding posts.

Pro-audio/stage gear always use connectors, because they must be installed quickly and often, and with correct polarity. Sometimes it's a 6.35 mm jack for low power, which is a terrible connector for this, because it shirt-circuits at insertion. Sometimes it's XLR, which is decent. Both jack and XLR are hazardous to the survival of the rest of the equipment, because then you get cables lying around with one end connected to a power amplifier, and the other end offering a connector that will fit just right into a lot of other stuff that should never be connected to the output of a power amplifier. And last, we have Speakon connectors of course, which are just awesome:

• Re, "XLR," Are you sure those weren't feeding "line level" signals to powered speakers? That's widely used for stage monitors these days, and it's becoming more and more common for FOH speakers in small venues. Apr 8 at 22:20
• Oh there used to be some unpowered speakers using XLR of 6.35mm Jack cables to the power amp... quite hazardous! Apr 9 at 6:45

Addendum: No established standards that would be suitable.

Generally common standards for pluggable speaker connectors, and their problems:

• XLR/Speakon and other professional connectors: Too expensive, too bulky, risk of confusion with other mechanically compatible connectors on equipment not intended for connections to speakers or amplifiers.

• 6.3mm Jack plugs: Mechanically not very robust. Risk of confusion wrt incompatible equipment. Also, very powerful amplifiers can actually create voltage outputs unsafe to touch, and Jack/TRS plugs would make a perfect hazard out of this.

• RCA connectors or smaller Jack plugs. Similar problems as with 6.3mm, add insufficient current handling capability.

• 4mm "Banana". Deprecated for speaker connections in the EU (actually, deprecated on anything that isn't laboratory equipment) because the pins fit into many 230V mains socket types common in the EU.

• There used to be a connector specifically for speakers, found on stereo equipment from the 1960s to 1980s, but manufacturers phased it out in favor of clamp connectors in the late 1980s. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DIN_connector#Other_designs Apr 8 at 10:11
• Another problem with 6.3mm jack plugs and banana plugs is the high risk of short-circuiting the amplifier which could well be fatal to the output stage. Apr 8 at 14:23
• "Din" connectors aren't actually named for Deutsche Industrie-Norm, but for the din they cause once they wear out.... Apr 8 at 19:25

By using clamps, the end-user can cut the speaker wire to any length without having to terminate it.

Speakers typically have "clip" or "post" or "banana" connectors. There is a reason not to use more convenient connectors such as RJ45: It is the ability to handle heavy gauge speaker wires in the case of long wire runs.

Heavy gauge wires are not needed for simple one room setups of 10ft wires into 4 or 8 ohm speakers. However, that changes starting at about 25ft runs. That is because high fidelity requires a high "damping factor" and the damping factor is affected by high speaker wire impedance. (Smaller wires or longer runs have higher impedance.) Damping factor is especially critical for realistic bass sound--in particular percussion instruments such as drums.

So it makes sense for speaker manufactures to not limit their use to 10ft runs, thus they must accommodate heaver wires. Here are the some wire diameter vs. wire length vs. speaker impedance (ohms) information:

• 10ft runs: use 18 gauge wires into 4 or 8 ohm speakers
• 25ft runs: use 18 gauge for 8 ohms & 16 gauge for 4 ohms
• 50ft runs: use 16 gauge for 8 ohms & 12 gauge for 4 ohms
• 100ft runs: use 12 gauge for 8 ohms & 10 gauge for 4 ohms