1
\$\begingroup\$

I build audio projects and small logic control circuits using point-to-point on perfboard (see pic of a recent build).

point-to-point on perfboard

As you can see this allows me to select wire gauge in accordance to the currents at various parts. When the board is finished, tested and washed I spray paint a clear enamel on the underside. I have built circuits running up to 450V like this without problems, but these are all low frequency projects.

Now I want to build a switcher-style power supply running at 50kHz. For the moment I am only in the exploratory stages as this is terra incognita for me. Is this building method any good for medium frequency work? I seem to recall having seen HF projects built in dead-bug fashion without issues, that can't be any worse no?

The only potential issue I see could be parasitic capacitance between the copper pads. If it is a problem, I could dissolve the unneeded pads using etchant - I have done this for boards that are connected to mains in order to reduce the potential for arcing. This is done before soldering parts - I design my boards with autoCAD so I know in advance which pads need to be kept.

The second point is about the use of a ground plane; this seems mandatory for switching circuits. I can implement it with a piece of plain PCB stock under the perfboard with drilled pass-through holes for the few pins that need to connect to it but there would be a space of almost 1/8" between the two boards, can this be a problem? If so I can place the plain PCB stock on a spot that isn't under parts so it is in direct contact but it will be of smaller area of course.

Alternatively, could a large-gauge piece of wire be used instead of a ground plane? If a low-impedance path is all that is needed that could fit the bill. A 18AWG wire has as much copper as a sizeable PCB plane no? There might be problems due to skin effect in the wire though...

I could etch a bona fide PCB but I'd rather not - I hate drilling dozens of holes using those crazy-thin drill bits, and I'm not convinced at all about consistancy of home-etched PCBs tracks physical/electrical properties. This is the reason I build point-to-point on perfboard.

Sorry for the long post and thanks in advance for any help! -Joe

\$\endgroup\$
14
  • \$\begingroup\$ Check out a technique called "Manhattan" building. This uses a combination of dead-bug as well as top-mounting components on tiny pads cut from a sheet of copper-clad circuit-board material. It is (relatively) easy to do and is probably faster than the perf-board that you showed. The substrate is a sheet of copper-clad circuit board which gives a great ground-plane with which to work. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 30, 2022 at 16:07
  • \$\begingroup\$ Radio Amateurs (HAMs) use this technique to build RF circuits into HF & VHF frequency ranges. For the tiny pads: I use a small Roper Whitney Jr hand punch to make pads 1/8" & 3/16" diameter from a sheet of 1/16" thick blank PCB material. A tiny dot of CA glue holds them in place. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 30, 2022 at 16:11
  • \$\begingroup\$ One of so very many examples <sdmakersguild.org/…> \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 30, 2022 at 16:15
  • \$\begingroup\$ For protoboards with ground planes, Busboard has ones for surface mount in their SPx series and Twin Industries has them for through-hole in their 8100 and 8200 series. 8200 actually provides two planes. Vector has them too but they are overprices by about 300%. Allows for things to be a bit neater than dead bugging on a plain copper board. \$\endgroup\$
    – DKNguyen
    Commented May 30, 2022 at 16:22
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Dwayne Reid Yes you remind me, I have seen projects built like that many years ago and they were pretty cool too! Thanks for your comments I'll keep this in mind. \$\endgroup\$
    – Joe
    Commented May 30, 2022 at 16:27

1 Answer 1

2
\$\begingroup\$

For switcher frequencies, you can forget about problems caused by excess pad capacitance, it's just not the right order of magnitude to cause trouble.

However, grounding is a more serious issue. It's not actually necessary to use a ground plane. It is necessary to have a ground return running close to all signal traces, to minimise the area of the current-switched loops that you will be creating in a switcher design, and to ensure that ground currents in one part of the design don't create stray voltages in other parts.

A gridded ground can work quite well. Something like a 10mm or 1/2" spaced grid of wires on both x and y axes, soldered together at every intersection, would be more than enough like a ground plane for switcher frequencies.

If you do use an additional board for a plane, the 1/8" gap should be fairly negligible.

What most RF engineers would do is start from a ground plane, and then mount components above it. You can get sets of pads, IC footprints, and transmission lines, on adhesive-backed copper clad. Another way to do this for cheap is to cut up some copper clad into tiny squares and strips, and epoxy or super-glue these down to the ground plane. Hint, 15 minute epoxy goes off in a few seconds if you hold a soldering iron to the pad.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Many thanks! I think I'll experiment will all the techniques you mentionned along with my original two-board sandwich idea, checking for transients in each. \$\endgroup\$
    – Joe
    Commented May 30, 2022 at 16:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.