I believe the solenoid has a rather large capacitance, and to be honest, I have no idea how to calculate or model it.
A model of the self capacitance of an inductor will allow you to understand where the capacitance is coming from, and to wind alternative topologies to reduce it. It will also allow you to get a (very) ballpark figure for what the capacitance is, hopefully within an order of magnitude.
Let's assume that a full finite element or integral solution of the 3D mess of conductors, airgaps, insulation is not needed. We then make some sweeping approximations to get into the right order of magnitude.
An inductor not only stores energy in the magnetic field due to current flowing, it also stores energy in the electric field between turns. We can model this energy storage as a capacitor across its terminals. This capacitor will store energy given by CV2/2. Where is the energy stored? Any wire in the winding will have a numer of other wires next to it. Those in the same layer will only have a single turn of voltage between them. Those in different layers will have hundreds of turns of voltage between them. Obviously the energy storage of the former pales into insignificance compared to the latter. Therrefore ...
Approximation - no energy is stored between the turns of a layer, all the energy is stored between layers.
Now the solenoid has suddenly become more tractable, 10 layers instead of 1000 turns.
Approximation - we replace each layer of turns by a sheet of voltage
To find the energy stored between each pair of adjacent layers, we sum, or integrate (whichever you feel happier with) the contribution of each bit of area as we go across the layers, using the standard parallel plate capacitance formula. Note that the 'normal' method of winding is to go 'back and forth', which means the voltage between the layers will be zero at one end, and twice the layer voltage at the other. A lower capacitance method of winding is to go 'forth and forth', always winding from the same end, and retracing the wire quickly back to the start. Now the voltage between layers is constant across the layer at one times the layer voltage, with the retrace wire adding negligible extra capacitance. This gives a lower stored energy between any pair of layers.
Finally, sum up all the energy stored between all pairs of layers for a unit voltage across the coil, and substitute back into the normal formula for energy in the coil's self capacitance.
You can reduce the energy dramatically (it goes as the square of the voltage) by reducing the voltage between layers. Two independent solenoids each of half the length reduces the length of the layer, and so the inter-layer voltage. Taken to its extreme, this results in several 'pancakes' stacked along the solenoid, a method of winding often seen in high frequency filters. It's also seen in segmented high voltage high frequency transformers. While it's probably principally for the electrical insulation, the resulting higher SRF of the winding is a very useful by-product.
Perhaps the biggest guess to make here if we want a quantitative estimate is the effective electrical distance between the layers. If it's a high voltage winding with a significant thickness of extra insulation between layers, say more than the conductor diameter, then your guess will be reasonably convincing. If it's just the wire enamel, or a single thin layer of tape, then it's a bit trickier, but an upper and lower bound ought to be possible, or even do a quick 2D FEA of this bit of geometry. If it's a scramble wound solenoid, then you're lost!