0
\$\begingroup\$

I've designed a PIN diode RF switch driver, specifically to drive HP33000 series switches. Unfortunately, these are very old, and not much documentation exists, so I'd like to ask for advice from those more experienced with using these devices, as well as for general design tips.

Looking through old HP documents(https://hpmemoryproject.org/an/pdf/an_58.pdf, https://www.hpl.hp.com/hpjournal/pdfs/IssuePDFs/1964-11.pdf), it is clear that switching time is improved by adding 'spikes' (see picture below) to the input waveform, to help overcome parasitic capacitances.
Depiction of input current 'spikes' that improve PIN diode switching time.

Unfortunately, I can't find any concrete details on what height or time scale these spikes should take place over. Are there typical rule-of-thumb values that I could start from?

Below is my design. I intend to take a TTL input on Vin, which is then used to drive the two MOSFETs. M1 has a low-pass filter, which is designed to be added to the +/- 5V output from M2, to create the characteristic spiking output. The spike height is adjusted using R6 / R7. The OFFSET input offsets the on and off state current draw based on an input voltage, and the current change between on and off is controlled by R9. The U2, U3, U5 bit at the end is a current source from an analog devices application note (https://www.analog.com/en/analog-dialogue/articles/a-large-current-source-with-high-accuracy-and-fast-settling.html). This is necessary because the PIN diode switches are current controlled. I use R15 as a dummy load to simulate the PIN diode switch input, although I suspect its behavior to be much more complicated. PIN diode driver schematic PIN diode driver simulation result

\$\endgroup\$

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$

I worked on something similar many, many (40+) years ago, so some of the details in what follows are fuzzy.

The PIN diode was used as an attenuator in the front end of a radar system. We needed to blank the receive front end during the transmit pulse, so as to not damage the front end LNA. The turn on and turn off (recovery) times needed to be fast so as to minimize the dead time in the radar's time line. I don't remember the exact numbers.

The waveform below is what we designed. enter image description here

Note that we did not have to overdrive the PIN diode to turn it on, but we did have to overdrive it turning off in order speed up the recombination of the minority carriers and thus speed up the turn off time.

So then as to your question as to the details of the spikes, a lot comes down to what your application requires and the characteristics of you particular PIN diode. IIRC, we wanted the dead time between transmit and receive to be less than 5% of the PRI (Pulse Repetition Interval), with less being better.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.