I designed a 5/24Vout voltage selector circuit with the schematic design that I drew below:

enter image description here

By bridging either Pin 1-2 or Pin 2-3 of J6, I could have two different voltage dividers leading to two different output voltages.

After producing the PCB for this, I tested the output voltage and found that if I selected 5V, the output voltage was about 9.35V and if I selected 24V the output voltage was 48V, about twice the intended output voltage of 5V/24V.

Knowing that the boost converter chip can only support up to 28Vout, I assumed that I had somehow drawn a series circuit on the PCB.

Would greatly appreciate it if somebody could point out the problem in the schematic/PCB, thanks!

PCB: enter image description here

Note: I selected either voltage by bridging Pin 1-2 or Pin 2-3 of J6 using this: enter image description here enter image description here

Link to boost converter:

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ IMO, your voltage selection method is risky. If the jumper falls off, the voltage can potentially become very large. I soldered connection for the voltage selection would be safer. \$\endgroup\$
    – Mattman944
    Commented Jul 24, 2022 at 14:19
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ @Mattman944 or redesign it in a way, that without jumper it's 5 V, with jumper it's 24 V... \$\endgroup\$
    – Arsenal
    Commented Jul 25, 2022 at 7:37
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ R33 and R35 are in parallel. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 25, 2022 at 14:26
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Someone has voted to close this for lacking details, I have no idea what kind of details could be possible to add to the complete schematics, PCB, datasheet to the component, and measurement on physical hardware! \$\endgroup\$
    – pipe
    Commented Jul 26, 2022 at 16:01

2 Answers 2


If I rearrange resistors R32, R33, R34 and R35, you can see immediately what the problem is:


simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

Check for yourself that this is equivalent to what you have built. Clearly R33 and R35 are connected in parallel, and their combined resistance is:

$$ \begin{aligned} R_P &= \frac{1}{\frac{1}{R_{33}} + \frac{1}{R_{35}}} \\ \\ &= \frac{1}{\frac{1}{2.20k\Omega} + \frac{1}{2.32k\Omega}} \\ \\ &= 1.13k\Omega \end{aligned} $$

Now with the jumper positioned to select the left path, the output voltage will be:

$$ \begin{aligned} V_{OUT} &= 0.6\left(1+\frac{16.5k\Omega}{1.13k\Omega}\right) \\ \\ &= 9.36V \end{aligned} $$

Fix this by completely removing R35, so that only \$R_P = R_{33} = 2.2k\Omega\$ remains. Then the left path will work as expected, and \$V_{OUT} = 5V\$.

You then have to change the value of R34. When the right path is selected by the jumper (for 24V), now you have two resistances R34 and R33, where R33 is now 2.2kΩ:

$$ \begin{aligned} V_{OUT} &= 0.6\left(1+\frac{R_{34}}{R_{33}}\right) \\ \\ R_{34} &= R_{33}\left(\frac{V_{OUT}}{0.6}-1\right) \\ \\ &= 2.2k\Omega\left(\frac{24}{0.6}-1\right) \\ \\ &= 85.8k\Omega \end{aligned} $$

So your final design looks like this:


simulate this circuit


R33 and R35 are connected in parallel here resulting in a equivalent resistance of 1.13K. No wonder therefore that you are getting your quoted output voltages.

To fix the problem remove R35. You'll then get your selected 5v output. You'll have to slightly tweak R34 to 86K to get 24V with the bottom 2.2K resistance.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.