Today, for the first time in my life I encountered the term "stabistor". From a quick search on the Internet it seems it's a two-terminal diode-like semiconductor device used to regulate low voltages, which resembles a forward-biased rectifier diode in its usage (or a chain of series-connected diodes).

The relevant Wikipedia page on stabistors is quite scant about them:

The stabistor (also called a forward reference diode) is the technical term used to designate a special type of semiconductor silicon diode featuring extremely stable forward voltage characteristics. These devices are specially designed for low-voltage stabilization applications requiring a guaranteed voltage over a wide current range and highly stable over temperature. In these applications, stabistors offer improved dynamic impedance (voltage change vs. current) than low voltage zener diodes where tunneling instead of avalanche current is dominant.

I also found an answer here on EE.SE which has some information. According to it, it seems stabistors are obsolete devices, although I found that Nexperia still produces the BAS17 stabistor.

However I found nothing about the actual construction or the principles of operations of those kind of devices.

Therefore I gather a stabistor is a silicon diode-like device that works in forward conduction mode that has a better forward characteristic than low-voltage Zeners (which employ tunneling and are notoriously inaccurate in their Vz). So they seem to work just like simple P-N junctions devices.

However, a common forward biased rectifier, even fast ones like the jellybean 1N4148 or 1N4150, have no particularly great dynamic impedance compared to Zeners in avalanche regimes IIRC. Have they really (as Wikipedia said) "extremely stable characteristics"? How do they obtain such claimed accuracy and low dynamic impedance?

Comparing the aforementioned BAS17 datasheet with the fairly common 1N4150, it doesn't seem such a great improvement: both of them have a forward voltage tolerance of about \$\pm 40\;\rm{mA}\$ in the range 1-100mA.

Then, what makes stabistors a better alternative than simply using a fast diode (or a bunch of fast diodes in series when a higher reference voltage is needed)? Is the name just a marketing stunt for some carefully specified fast diode?

Moreover, why have they become obsolete (if they actually are)? Yes, I know that a reference IC like a cheap TL431 is more accurate, more flexible and still cheap, but it also has drawbacks due to it being a complex IC, such as stability issues and probably higher ESD sensitivity. So I guess that a fairly accurate "reference diode" could still have its place where circuit design simplicity and robustness is preferred.


2 Answers 2


I continued my Internet search for a reliable source of information about stabistors, and I found a very old GE transistor manual (1964) that answers most of my original questions, albeit briefly.

In chapter 17, titled SILICON SIGNAL DIODES & SNAP DIODES, at page 450 there is the following section:

enter image description here

So, according to that source, stabistors (a.k.a. low-voltage reference diodes) have the following characteristics:

  • Physically they are silicon PN-junction devices, containing one or more PN-junctions connected in series.

  • Their forward VF – IF characteristic is tightly controlled (from process or post-production selection this is not clear, maybe both).

  • They are meant to be used only forward biased (confirming that they are indeed diodes whose forward voltage drop is used as voltage reference).

  • Their tempco is greater than that of a Zener diode, but this drawback is compensated by a tighter initial tolerance, lower dynamic impedance and absence of low-current noise. All this produces a more accurate voltage reference over the operating current and temperature range.


The fact that a stabistor is probably not a particularly sophisticated device can be indirectly inferred by the following amusing anecdote, taken from this document:

Report to the Computer History Museum on the Information Technology Corporate Histories Project: Fairchild Corporation.

That is a collection of inside stories of Fairchild Corporation former employees, collected for their historical relevance in the development of electronic industry.

At page 85 there is this story (emphasis mine):

Title: Simpler Times and almost the largest diode order in history

Author: David Laws

I joined SGS-Fairchild in South Ruislip near London, England in 1966. After 2 years in marketing and sales, Bill Welling rescued me from a lifetime sentence of English weather and cooking in 1968 and hired me as a Headquarter Sales Engineer in Mountain View. My yearly salary was equal to that paid to the Prime Minister of England. Thank you, thank you, thank you, Bill!!!

My first weekend was spent at the Monterey Pop Festival enveloped in a cloud of strange, sweetsmelling cigarette smoke watching Janis Joplin and band members of Big Brother and the Holding Company down a whole bottle of Southern Comfort during an extraordinary twenty minute rendition of "Me and Bobby McGee." The next week I discovered Bill Graham's Fillmore in San Francisco where Jimi Hendix was performing. Ken Kesey and the Merry Pranksters were terrorizing the residents of La Honda while Roy Kepler, of Kepler's Books, taught courses on nonviolence to the likes of Joan Baez. Around the Stanford campus, the Midpeninsula Free University offered a curriculum of bee-raising, bread-making, massage, meditation, psychedelic dancing, and yoga. A simpler but memorable era!

My job was to sell anything that was not bolted down to any customer who would pay money up front west of the Rockies. This included bent silicon wafers to National (Charlie didn't want to pay for straight ones) and out of spec packages to AMI. One of the more enterprising characters, Arnie Aplebaum, made a lot of money selling "repurposed" reject power transistors to the military. He sawed the top off the metal can, removed the die and then mounted two side-by-side onto a new header wired into a Darlington configuration. This device produced sufficient gain to ship against a mil spec that he had somehow managed to gain approval on.

I very nearly closed the largest diode order in history with Joe Patridge (I'm pretty sure that's who it was) who at that time worked for Burns and Towne. B & T had an operation that purchased fallout devices and re-screened them to sell to Hong Kong radio manufacturers. Those that did not work at all would be mounted in unconnected sockets on the pc board. These radios could then be advertised as 12 transistor models to consumers who did not know that only 6 or so of the transistors actually did anything. Anyway, back to the diode story. Ever since the diode plant had opened in San Rafael in 1959 reject devices had been stored in barrels in a warehouse next door. We estimated that these barrels held close to 100 million diodes. B & T knew that they could sell many of them as stabistors and reclaim the rest for their precious material content. We agreed a price that was approved by Tom Bay but by the time the P.O arrived in August of 1968 so had Hogan and crew. The new management thought that they could find a better deal and cancelled my potential historic order. As far as I know, when I left Fairchild 4 years later San Rafael was still paying to store the diodes in the rented warehouse.

While working on this deal I was taken on a tour of the San Rafael facility. It was a typical 1960's semiconductor plant where you could walk into the fab, test, and assembly areas in your street clothes. The exception was the wafer sort station. There you were best outfitted with a pair of rubber boots. Test engineering had figured out that most electrical failures were caused by voids in the die metallization. So rather than perform an expensive electrical wafer sort, they scribed the die and dropped them into a bucket of water. The metal voids trapped bubbles of air that caused potential die failures to float to the top. These were skimmed off and the good die at the bottom moved on to the assembly line. Simpler times indeed!

Note: I quoted the entire story because it is amusing and really on topic wrt. electronics history, although not all parts are relevant to the answer.

That story tells us that at that time a stabistor could well be a rejected diode (so maybe not up to spec with their reverse max voltage or reverse leakage current) that could still be sold as a stabistor after a selection process.

So definitely not a specialty or exotic device at all!!!

  • \$\begingroup\$ NOTE: before accepting my own answer, I'll wait some time for other, possibly better answers to pop up. \$\endgroup\$ Sep 30, 2022 at 15:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ I wonder if these "evolved out of" the use of selenium and copper oxide rectifiers as loose voltage stabilizers, like how zener diodes can be seen as the modern equivalent of neon glow tubes used for the same purpose. \$\endgroup\$
    – Hearth
    Sep 30, 2022 at 15:51
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Hearth for what I can tell, it was sort of a marketing stuff. Once they understood the PN-junction properties, especially applied to silicon devices, they realized that they could use forward-biased strings of diodes as a voltage reference. Once they also realized that for low voltages that gave them some advantages compared to low-voltage Zeners, they just adjusted the process or simply selected some parts with suitable ratings and they labeled them with a catchy name. \$\endgroup\$ Sep 30, 2022 at 17:19
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @Hearth I can't find nothing suggesting some kind of advanced technology and I think that Wikipedia article is exaggerating with adjectives, depicting stabistors as some kind of "ultra precise specialty device": "extremely stable forward voltage characteristics", "specially designed for low-voltage stabilization applications requiring a guaranteed voltage over a wide current range and highly stable over temperature". I suspect whoever wrote the article hasn't really compared the datasheets to some jellybean diode and just went with the possible marketing hype of the time. \$\endgroup\$ Sep 30, 2022 at 17:23
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Hearth In fact they almost quote exactly the words of a manufacturer cited in a reference link at the bottom of the page. \$\endgroup\$ Sep 30, 2022 at 17:27

You are comparing apples and oranges when comparing with Zeners in the avalanche region. Stabistors were more useful when the desired voltage was low (and when there was no higher voltage available) so in the mushy Zener region.

I believe they're only better than 1N4148s (or a Vbe multiplier) in that there is a relatively tight specification of the resulting voltage.

A bandgap reference such as the TL431, LMV431, LM4040 or even a cheap voltage regulator containing a bandgap reference is a much better and often cheaper voltage reference than a special forward-biased silicon diode (there are probably at least 10 TL431s within a few meters radius of you right now), however there are cases where you actually may want the reference to change with temperature to compensate something else (such as when biasing a bipolar amplifier stage).

Of course nowadays that is often taken care of out of sight of the board-level designer on a chip somewhere, with all the additional advantages of good matching of semiconductor parameters).

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you anyway, but I know all this, as I briefly mentioned in my post. Sorry if I wasn't clear. I know avalanche breakdown grants more accuracy for high-voltage Zeners, and I've understood that stabistors were meant as a replacement for low-voltage Zeners (where tunneling takes places and gives rise to mediocre charaacterics). I also mentioned TL431. \$\endgroup\$ Sep 30, 2022 at 14:07
  • \$\begingroup\$ My curiosity was twofold: 1. what kind of device were they physically (where they simply pn-junctions with carefully specified doping or geometry, or where they different devices). 2. What were the advantages over a decades old device like the 1N4150, i.e. a humble small signal fast diode. \$\endgroup\$ Sep 30, 2022 at 14:07
  • \$\begingroup\$ It would be nice if someone would point me toward some documentation about the inner working of the device, especially if it turns out to be something fundamentally different from a PN-junction. Comparing datasheets is not particularly insightful, since comparing the 1N4150 and the BAS17 I linked to didn't show huge differences (at least not differences relevant enough to justify using a whole different name for the latter device, unless it employs a somewhat different principle of operation). \$\endgroup\$ Sep 30, 2022 at 14:15
  • \$\begingroup\$ @LorenzoDonatisupportUkraine Looking at the datasheet you linked, it appears to just be a pn junction where the manufacturer has done more than the usual amount of characterization of the I-V curve, and guarantees specific voltage ranges at specific currents. It doesn't look like there's anything particularly special about the diode itself. The difference from the 1N4150 would be that the characteristics were guaranteed (I wouldn't be surprised if the 1N4150's original datasheet didn't have the voltage rated at more than a single current), and the part is rated to have a specific tempco. \$\endgroup\$
    – Hearth
    Sep 30, 2022 at 14:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ I have databooks that old, but not (much) for the rather niche stabistors- including the Japanese language abbreviated data I scanned for another answer. Maybe you could find some ads in old copies of trade rags. The designers of those things are likely dead of old age by now, to put it bluntly, so unless there are patents, revealing ads, or more complete datasheets it will be hard to find out additional details. 'Stabistors' in early (eg. 1958) patents were described as similar to ancient standard silicon diodes of the day. Eg. SG22. \$\endgroup\$ Oct 1, 2022 at 7:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.