We have a system at my work that controls a furnace via a NI cRIO. This circuit currently uses a SCR (model listed below) with the cRIO to switch power out to the furnace. I don't want to get into the weeds but I would like to swap out this SCR for an SSR (model listed below). Currently the SCR signal is limited to 25% of the maximum possible output via the cRIO. My coworker claims that at full signal, this SCR actually decreases the max amount of current that will pass through the furnace heating elements by 25% while the SSR will give 100% current for 25% of the time. This will require a full HAZOP because our max current draw will be 4x now.
I don't think this is true from my reading. I think the SCR would give 100% current 25% of the time, it'll just do it at a much higher frequency than the SSR and with lower thermal shock effects. Can anyone comment if my assessment is correct? It would be much more convenient on my end to use an SSR b/c that's what the rest of our equipment uses.
Link to SCR: WATLOW DIN-A-MITE DA10-24F0-0000
SSR part: CRYDOM D2425