1
\$\begingroup\$

I am trying to achieve impedance matching using load-pull mechanism and I recently found out that on a Smith chart in the VNA, the S21 doesn't make any sense as I have to plot transmission parameters on a polar plot.

But what if I achieve impedance matching (point at the 50 Ω impedance match), does that mean I really achieved impedance match even though the R+jX components are not 50+j0 or 1+j0? And why should I consider plotting s21 on a Smith chart?

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ The S21 of what? \$\endgroup\$
    – hobbs
    Commented Jan 24, 2023 at 9:30
  • \$\begingroup\$ After TRM and TRL calibration, I have observed that S11 and S22 are matched(exactly at the centre of the Smith Chart) but the transmission parameters S21 and S12 are not. I have created a setup using waveguides and a magic T. The idea is that I take some metals or some solid materials of several different lengths and use them as sliding stubs to change the load. I have found out that the waveguides have an impedance of around 500 ohms. But when I am making both the planes match in the centre, and they do but I am not able to achieve the ideal impedance which 1+j0 or 50+j0. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 25, 2023 at 11:31

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$

A Smith chart is simply a polar plot of the magnitude and phase of a number. It's useful to plot the reflection coefficient, S11 on a polar plot, and overlay a special scale in ohms.

After Thru calibration, S21 will appear to be 1.0 + j0.0. On the polar plot / Smith chart this is a spot at the left.
It would be unusual to plot S21 on a polar or smith chart as it's quite hard to interpret anything useful from it there.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.