# What is the Need for modulation

What is the need for any kind of modulation in order to transmit signals?

• Modulation isn't needed to transmit signals! Apr 11, 2013 at 20:16
• @LeonHeller, modulation is needed if you want the transmitted signal to carry any useful information. It would be better to explain this distinction to the OP rather than just shouting at everybody. Apr 11, 2013 at 20:57
• You can transmit signals without modulation : this is baseband communication - it's certainly possible, and does carry information; the problem is that it restricts your communication options (for example : using wires). Modulation separates the "transmission" problem from the "information" problem offering hugely more and usually better options. Apr 11, 2013 at 21:15
• @BrianDrummond, I think of what you're describing as modulation without the carrier. Whether it's technically considered modulation or not is a question of semantics. On the one hand, Wikipedia defines modulation in relation to a carrier. On the other hand they then go on to define "baseband modulation" as what you are calling "baseband communication". Apr 11, 2013 at 22:30
• Baseband communication is still modulation. You're modulating the DC function $y = 0$ with squiggles that carry information, thereby creating fuzzy side-bands around $f = 0$. :)
– Kaz
Apr 12, 2013 at 0:26

Modulation is, generically, a means of shifting information from one frequency domain into (typically) a higher frequency domain. This provides a number of benefits; among them:

• Two or more input signals with matching or overlapping frequency domains may have their information shifted into disjoint frequency domains; if such signals travel together through a medium, having their frequency domains be disjoint will allow them to be separated.

• In many cases it's easier to uniformly handle signals where the minimum frequency is a substantial fraction of the maximum, than signals where the maximum is many times the minimum. An audio signal whose frequency content is 20-20,000Hz has a 1,000:1 spread between the minimum and maximum frequencies. If such a signal were amplitude-modulated at 1MHz, the spread would be about 4% [from 980,000Hz to 1,020,000Hz]. Even if there were no other radio communications anywhere in the world, trying to design an antenna which could work well with a 1,000:1 frequency spread (from 20Hz to 20KHz) would be very difficult. Designing an antenna to deal with a 4% spread would be much easier.

Some use cases for modulation exploit both benefits; others only rely upon one or the other.

Modulation is the means to transmit information using a radio signal. The carrier frequency of a commercial radio station is used to place the signal within the allotted spectrum of a particular radio service. For example, AM radio covers the frequency band from 540 to 1640 kilohertz. Let's say that one station has been assigned the carrier frequency of 1010 kilohertz. If it just transmitted that carrier, no information would be available to the listener. By modulating that carrier (in this case amplitude modulation) information can be transmitted. If the amplitude modulation is made to be in step with a song, for example, than a listener can tune his radio to the carrier frequency and the demodulator in the radio will reproduce the song. Since modulation creates sidebands around the carrier frequency, the modulation frequency is limited (to about 5 kilohertz for regular AM radio) so that many stations can be accommodated in the 540 to 1640 kHz band. For amplitude modulation, the bandwidth transmitted by the radio station is twice the audio bandwith of the modulating signal. Thus each AM station occupies 10 kHz of the available spectrum. With 1100 kHz available, many stations can be transmitting at the same time.

Have you got a radio? Have you noticed that you can tune through several stations across any band on your radio? When you tune to one station, have you noticed that you don't pick-up any (or maybe slight sometimes if AM) signals from other stations?

If "yes" to the above then perhaps you'll realize that there has to be a way to differentiate one station from another. If there wasn't a way of doing this, your radio speaker would be just producing an unintelligible mess of a sound.

The way we can do this is by modulation. Every transmitting station produces an audio signal that it "mixes" with the allotted frequency in the radio spectrum the government has allocated to it. OK sometimes governments don't allocate frequencies but a lot of the time they do.

EDIT - The "mixing" is better defined by the word "modulation" and this process allows us the means to tune our radios to whichever channel we want in the radio band in question.

• Modulation doesn't "allow us to tune our radios to whichever channel we want." Apr 11, 2013 at 20:28
• @LeonHeller maybe I'm being daft and not reading into my own words what you see or maybe your are being a pedant or maybe a bit of both but I'll change it and possibly you can further comment. Apr 11, 2013 at 20:35
• I agree with @LeonHeller. What you describe is all the result of different carrier frequencies, not of modulation per se. The technical process concerned is superheterodyning, not modulation. Apr 11, 2013 at 23:26
• @EJP Superheterodyning - what part of my answer implies this? Apr 12, 2013 at 8:59
• @Andyaka All of it. Modulation has nothing to do with the existence and detectability of different stations. Different carrier frequencies and the superhet process account for that. Apr 13, 2013 at 10:12

If you are referring to communications. The answer can be broken down into two main answers:

1. Matching the transmission characteristics of the medium, and considerations of power and antenna size, which impact portability.
2. The second is the desire to multiplex, or share, a communication medium among many concurrently active users.

Below: an example of modulation ...