In the equivalent circuit for a transformer, does only the no-load current I0 pass through core loss Rc and magnetizing reactance Xm? Or does load current also pass through Rc and Xm?

The figure above suggests only the no-load current passes through Rc and Xm, but my textbook shows both the no-load current and the load current I2/a passing through the parallel path. Which depiction is correct?

Note: the textbook authors chose the direction of I2 to yield positive coefficients in the equations \begin{align} \mathrm V_1&=(r_1+j\omega L_{11})I_{1} + (j\omega L_{12})I_{2} \end{align} \begin{align} \mathrm V_2&=(j\omega L_{21})I_{1}+(r_2+j\omega L_{22})I_{2} \end{align}

• I think this circuit diagram very clearly shows that the load current does not pass through Rc and Xm. Commented Feb 22, 2023 at 2:11
• By "this circuit diagram" do you mean the first or the second? Commented Feb 22, 2023 at 5:05
• @artist_and_not_EE_by_training only one diagram has Rc and Xm Commented Feb 22, 2023 at 5:25
• The second diagram is the same as the first but with different labels on it. The fact that the inductor and resistor are swapped on the top row does not make any difference; the fact the resistor is drawn with a zigzag instead of a box does not make any difference. Commented Feb 22, 2023 at 17:42
• In the first diagram, the reflected load current (not shown) is directed to the right. In the second diagram, the reflected load current I2/a is directed to the left Commented Feb 22, 2023 at 18:31

The first diagram shows I0 passing through Rc and Xm. The primary current Ip is the sum of I0 and the scaled output current that is not explicitly shown.

The second diagram shows the difference between I1 and I2/a passing through Gc and Bm, without calling it anything.

These two versions are equivalent, at least mathematically.

There are two specified currents at the node where Xp/X1, Rc/Gc, Xm/Bm and RsN2/x2a2 meet. The third is given by Kirchoff.

The current flowing through the Xm/Bm Rc/Gc components (let's call this the core current) is controlled essentially by the constant input voltage, as the components Rp/r1 and Xp/x1 tend to be very small. It is therefore more or less constant.

I find the first diagram easier to be intuitive about, as we can just say that the input current Ip is the sum of this core current, and the turns-scaled load current drawn by the ideal transformer.

My problem with the second one, though entirely consistent with the first, is that we have a small current drawn by the core components, which consists of the small difference between two large and variable currents I1 and I2/a. As such, I find it difficult to think other than that this core current could be very wild and variable. As it happens, I1 varies exactly as needed to be the sum of the more or less constant core current and I2/a, so thinking of the core current as a difference is unhelpful, at least to me, and it sounds like to you as well.

• Seems like you're saying I2/a just "stops" at the junction without going anywhere, and that only the no-load current passes through Gc and Bm? How can I2/a just "stop"? Commented Feb 22, 2023 at 15:07
• @artist_and_not_EE_by_training I1 is roughly -I2/a, so neither 'stop', they are just both practically the same current, their small difference (when the transformer is on load) being the GcBm current. See my update tot he answer. Commented Feb 22, 2023 at 15:54

does only the no-load current I0 pass through core loss Rc and magnetizing reactance Xm?

Yes, Approximately. The coupling magnetization current, represented by Io is not very sensitive to the load current unless you consider the drop in voltage across Zm from secondary loading.

Also, the current in Rc is much lower than Xm.

As @Neil answered, the two schematics are equivalent and do not contradict each other or this answer.

does only the no-load current I0 pass through core loss Rc and magnetizing reactance Xm?

Correct.

does load current also pass through Rc and Xm?

No it doesn't.

my textbook shows both the no-load current and the load current I2/a passing through the parallel path

The load current does not pass through Rc/Xm aka Gc/Bm.

• "By writing Kirchoff's voltage equation around the path of each of the currents I1 and I2/a... the reader should find that" the equations above are satisfied exactly. It seems to me that the equivalent circuit is consistent with the equations only when we assume that I1 and I2/a share the parallel path. How else can V1 be a function of both I1 and I2? Commented Feb 22, 2023 at 14:54