Passive balancing usually works only in the charging end area, i.e. when the cells of a battery pack are almost fully charged. In the case of those cells that have already reached the end-of-charge voltage, a resistor is connected in parallel by the balancer and the voltage is thus limited to the end-of-charge voltage. In this procedure the average cell voltages in the pack would rather decline.
As far as I understand passive cell balancing in a battery pack, it can maintain the state of symmetry within the pack so that all cells maintain or regain the same state of charge. This can certainly be one reason why a well-balanced battery pack will perform better and maybe even longer than an unbalanced battery pack. In addition, since each of the cells within the pack has its own slightly different self-discharge ratio, if this is not balanced, the pack will gradually lose usable capacity, which is an important aging factor.
In the case of the BMS I actually have in mind balancing is allowed/started after rest phases (as the state of charge (SOC) can be estimated or set by open-circuit-voltage (OCV) recalibration) based on certain:
- temperature (min, max values),
- SOC (min and max values),
- and voltage conditions (min, max and delta voltage values).
For example balancing could start at 20% SOC till 90% SOC, when the spreading between the minimum und maximum cell voltage is above 15mV within a given temperature range.
My question is as follows: Can passive balancing in general or balancing as applied in this BMS improve the lifespan of a lithium-ion battery pack? (I've done some research and still do to find relevant studies but so far failed, I only found typical articles saying balancing is good for both performance and a longer age, as if the topic was self-explanatory: some studies on the topic might be much appreciated)
Or could you at least confirm or correct the above logic as I understand it?