# Help with diagnosing a dual voltage power supply

Currently I’m working on my first electrical project and having a few issues with the negative side of the supply, it is not adjusting the same as my positive side, and I think the LM337 is blown?

I’ve attached a photo of the circuit, which consists of an LM317/337 with 2 PNP/NPN's in parallel for boosted current.

There is no capacitor on the adj pin, and no output capacitors currently so there are no bypass diodes in place as recommended from the 317/337 datasheet. Although I do plan to add them in the future.

EDIT: I’ve tested the npn transistors on the negative side and they are good. R5 and R6 also have a potentiometer following them to limit the minimum voltage to 24 volts with the maximum at 49 volts.

If there are any recommendations to improve this circuit in any way I'd love to hear them. I’ve seen so many different LM317 current boosted circuits that I decided to try and design my own instead.

EDIT 2: After doing a bit of research I was able to find another person referencing issues with a current boosted LM337.
Using a low-esr, 220µ cap at the output solved the problem completely. But their solution was adding a 12uh inductor in series with a 2.7 Ω resistor on the emitter of the NPN.

Apparently ouput/adj pin capacitors are critical in a current boosted lm337 circuit.

• Am I the only one to think that 49V and LM317 / LM337 don't play well together? Paralleling BJTs has its own tricks as well Commented Apr 1, 2023 at 6:55
• (@fraxinus: With no "choke input", no (minimum) load specified and about 1 A, I harbour doubts - about dissipation as well as voltage. The voltage to rate is output - input: if input was 52-53 V, it might work.) Commented Apr 1, 2023 at 7:42
• You want a symmetrical PS adjustable from 24 V to 49 V, 10 A? Even if the input to the regulators never exceeded 54 V, that is almost 30 V across the ICs. Say 7°/C (TO220 + 2°/C mounting+heat sink) and 70° allows 10 W tops - 0.33 A, not 1.5 A. And you will need to design carefully for a transformer+bridge+filter not to exceed 64 V as well as supporting 49 V out. Commented Apr 1, 2023 at 7:55
• @fraxinus The LM317 only "sees" the voltage between IN and OUT, which is 53-24=29V here, less than the maximum of 40V, so it should be good. Commented Apr 1, 2023 at 7:58
• With 37 Vrms input to the rectifier (simulated or measured?), you will have trouble to get multiple Amperes above about 42 V. What is the point of the exercise? If it isn't gaining knowledge about obsolete PS designs, pick a different circuit altogether. Boosting linear regulator output current with an active bypass was useful for small factors, only. Commented Apr 1, 2023 at 8:25