2
\$\begingroup\$

I have been looking around at different front end implementations for a DIY oscilloscope and came across a variant that I found simple enough as a starting point.

I have a question about protecting the inputs though. Please look at the attached schematic. AFE design

The way I understand it, there is no protection for the input of the OPA659 buffer. As per the datasheet, the maximum input can be 0.4V above 5V. Would this not mean that a higher signal mistakenly connected to the oscilloscope could damage it?

Would it make sense to clamp the input voltages to the +5V and -5V rails using clamping diodes?

Could I use a +-15V supply to increase the range of my input signals and modify the subsequent attenuation to bring it within range of my ADC?

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ Any series resistor would risk becoming a low-pass filter with the first stage, but it can be reasonable. Then it could be interesting to put some low-leakage clamp diodes or half BJT using the B-E junction, or even an N-JFET with S-D shorted together. Clamping to supplies, or pre-polarized Zeners (to lower the capacitance). Are you sure of your tiny 220 pF DC input blocker? Looks to be quite tiny, as if you were considering only relatively high-frequency AC \$\endgroup\$
    – LuC
    May 5 at 12:10
  • \$\begingroup\$ This is a design I found online and not my own, hence I cannot say much about the design choices made. I am open to suggestions though \$\endgroup\$
    – ACBlue
    May 5 at 13:33

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$

Would this not mean that a higher signal mistakenly connected to the oscilloscope could damage it?

It could immediately damage it or, it could weaken it in such a way that performance is degraded.

Would it make sense to clamp the input voltages to the +5V and -5V rails using clamping diodes?

That makes sense plus, add a series resistor to the non-inverting input so that current is limited at +/- 5.4 volts. However, upon checking the data sheet, the absolute maximum rating is the supply rail and not 0.4 volts beyond the supply rails: -

enter image description here

So, using protection diodes to the op-amp supply rails is not going to work. However, the input common-mode range is +/- 3 volts on a +/- 6 volt supply as per this data sheet extract: -

enter image description here

So, on a +/- 5 volt supply, the usable input range will be about +/- 2 volts hence, you could use steering diodes to +/- 3.3 volts (if you have those supply rails.

But you have another problem here: -

enter image description here

  • You have no bleed resistor to ground when coupling via the capacitor
  • The capacitor will remain charged when you revert to DC coupling
\$\endgroup\$
3
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Excellent points. Note that since the input is buffered, input clamping can be done through a bootstrapped diode pair, and 3.3V supplies can be furnished with zener shunt regulators. This keeps capacitance low / bandwidth high. \$\endgroup\$ May 5 at 12:02
  • \$\begingroup\$ The datasheet has a section 8.2.1 where ESD protection diodes are mentioned. It says "These diodes provide moderate protection to input overdrive voltages above the supplies as well": I read in another op-amp datasheet that these diodes have a typical forward voltage of 0.7V so a Schottky Diode will clamp larger inputs to just 5.4 keeping it below the threshold of 5V + 0.7V. This was my assumption when I mentioned 0.4V. \$\endgroup\$
    – ACBlue
    May 5 at 13:41
  • \$\begingroup\$ @ACBlue the picture in 8.2.1 show internal diodes and, the protection they offer is for ESD events (very short-lived events) and not suitable for "a higher signal mistakenly connected" (as you wrote in your question). I would certainly consider adding a resistor of maybe 100 ohms directly in series with the non-inverting input though. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    May 5 at 15:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.