8
\$\begingroup\$

I'm looking at a British schematic from 1960 and the diode symbols all have half-arrowheads. Was this a standard diode symbol or does this indicate something special about the diodes?

The symbol looks somewhat like a Shockley 4-layer diode, but from the circuit, the diodes seem to be normal diodes. This post discusses a completely different strange diode symbol.

A schematic detail showing the half-arrow diodes. A diode in parallel with a solenoid.

Edit: the half-diodes also appear on the cover of this vintage Italian book: A book titled Amplificatori Magnetici with a schematic on the cover.

\$\endgroup\$
6
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ maybe a selenium rectifier \$\endgroup\$
    – jsotola
    May 21 at 4:45
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Was there a legend with the diagram? \$\endgroup\$
    – Solar Mike
    May 21 at 6:25
  • \$\begingroup\$ @SolarMike No. Just a normal schematic. \$\endgroup\$ May 21 at 16:45
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Not an answer, but maybe some hints. I have a Telequipment D43 oscilloscope from about 1965. It was made in the UK. The schematics in the D43 manual use diode symbols with full arrows for germanium diodes. All other diodes have half-arrowheads. "Other" includes high voltage selenium, silicon, and Zener diodes. \$\endgroup\$
    – JRE
    May 21 at 17:15
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @JRE That's a good theory. These are silicon diodes (ZR21 and RS22A) but the device is from the era when germanium was still in use. \$\endgroup\$ May 22 at 0:09

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$

This is likely a so called Shockley diode. Of course for the circuit, which appears to be a PSU circuit, you would just use a decent rectifier.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shockley_diode

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Seems very unlikely to me, and there is the same link in the question. A similar answer with an image was deleted a few weeks ago (which you can't see because you don't have the rep yet). \$\endgroup\$ Jun 9 at 20:14
  • \$\begingroup\$ Regarding the documentation on wikipedia this might still be the case. This diode type was used in audio applications. Even though this is not the indended usecase, the author of this schematic actually might have made a mistake. Just consider the lack of google at the time of the creation. It for sure is supposed to be a high current capable regular silicon Diode, but the audio context might have caused this error. Of course it is an assumption - but I am sure that we will never know 100% for sure. \$\endgroup\$ Jun 21 at 15:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.