5
\$\begingroup\$

When applying the IEC/EN 61000-4-2:2009 and IEC/EN 61000-4-5:2014 standards for our device, our consulting firm recommended bypassing the input power jack to the chassis ground using two 33nF capacitors based on the device's circumstances.

Recommended circuit

To ensure compliance, I reviewed the test requirements and found that a voltage of ±4 kV can be induced to the device's body.

Should the rated voltage of the mentioned bypass capacitors be at least 4 kV to handle this level of test voltage?

Furthermore, considering the ±8 kV air discharge immunity requirement, how does this impact the choice of components?

Lastly, from a technical perspective, would it be more suitable to use X1, Y2 type capacitors or high voltage generic capacitors?"

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Regardless of the ESD concerns, if the chassis is otherwise floating, it would make sense to have a 1 Mohm resistor between chassis ground and electrical ground. This is to avoid any unexpected build-up of charge in the capacitors, which could then result in a current pulse of non-ESD origin. \$\endgroup\$
    – jpa
    Jul 9 at 7:12

1 Answer 1

4
\$\begingroup\$

Should the rated voltage of the mentioned bypass capacitors be at least 4 kV to handle this level of test voltage?

No, because there is limited energy from the surge transient and, that energy (when applied) will charge up the 33 nF capacitors to a much lower voltage. It's fairly easy to simulate for both surge and ESD; it's a case of a high voltage low pF capacitor in the test gun (or apparatus) sharing its charge with two 33 nF capacitors. The resultant terminal voltage might be a couple of hundred volts for 6100-4-5 surges and probably much less than 100 volts for an ESD discharge.

Simulation is your friend here.

from a technical perspective, would it be more suitable to use X1, Y2 type capacitors or high voltage generic capacitors?

Work out what the theoretical peak voltage is then, estimate the current pulse taken through the 33 nF capacitors when subject to the surge. If necessary you can use metallized film polypropylene capacitors if, the current surge is higher than a regular ceramic capacitor can handle.

It's a numbers game.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ That was an excellent answer! Thank you so much. I was so focused on the rules and regulations that I momentarily lost sight of the actual thing! \$\endgroup\$
    – Sepehr
    Jul 8 at 16:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.