# Current direction in full-wave rectifier circuit during positive half-cycle

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

'Microelectronics' by Sedra and Smith describes the behaviour of the above circuit (image taken from book): a transformer with an AC supply on its primary winding and a centre-tapped secondary winding with a rectifier.

It says that diode D1 conducts during the positive half-cycle while diode D2 is off. In the negative half-cycle, the opposite happens.

My question is regarding the direction of the secondary circuit's current. In up to period T/4, current will be increasing in the primary and magnetic flux will be increasing in the secondary winding. So current will flow through D1.

But from period T/4 to T/2, current will be decreasing in the primary, so magnetic flux will decrease in the secondary winding. According to Lenz's Law, shouldn't the direction of current in the secondary now be opposite to its direction in period 0 to T/4?

I mean, we are getting two opposite directions of current during the same positive half-cycle. But why this is not happening? Why we are getting same current direction in positive half cycle?

up to period T/4 current will be increasing in 'transformer primary', so magnetic flux will be increasing in 'transformer secondary'

and

from period T/4 to T/2 current will be decreasing in 'transformer primary', so magnetic flux will be decreasing in 'transformer secondary'.

It seems that the whole premise of your question assumes that secondary current creates a flux in the transformer core. This is incorrect because any flux created by secondary current is wholly cancelled by the opposite current (divided by the turns ratio) in the primary.

The only flux in the transformer is from the applied voltage and the inductance of the primary.

If (in another universe) they did add or subtract flux then we could never get a transformer to work (due to subtraction of flux) or, that alternative universe would self-destruct due to induction runaway (if fluxes added).

• so you mean increase or decrease in flux due to the primary transformer will not change current !? but how does the faraday's law and lenz's law holds here? according to law if you increase magnetic flux ,the current will be opposite to when you decrease the magnetic flux. Jul 14, 2023 at 11:05
• The current in the secondary is due to the secondary induced voltage and the load connected to the secondary and, nothing else (basic ohms law). The secondary induced voltage is due to primary voltage and turns ratio. You can't suddenly create an opposite current at the peak of the voltage waveform that is driving a load resistor. Jul 14, 2023 at 11:08
• can you pls clarify what happens during the 0 to T/4 vs T/4 to T/2 ? Jul 14, 2023 at 11:11
• Between 0 and T/2 you get the positive voltage waveform of a sinewave. Between 0 and T/4 it is rising up to a peak and, from T/4 to T/2 it starts at the peak and falls down to zero. All the time, a positive current is produced in the resistive load. @AlzenoDoe if we are done here, please take note of this: What should I do when someone answers my question. If you are still confused about something then leave a comment to request further clarification. Jul 14, 2023 at 13:18
• Yep , wouldn't the magnetic flux due to the primary coil gradually decrease from T/4 to T/2 as current falls to zero? Then we are getting, a negative flux change. and negative flux change should induce opposite current now? , I'm kinda embarrassed but I need clarity to myself and sorry for interrupting you ☺️ Jul 14, 2023 at 15:01

You're mixing up your currents and voltages. Depending on the load applied on the secondary, the phase relationship between voltage and current changes.

Let's say we have an AC voltage applied to our primary side that has the shape of sin(t). Since the primary coil is an inductor, we know that the current in the primary will be behind the voltage by 90 degrees. Therefore we know that primary current will look like cos(t).

We know from faraday's law that the magnetic flux is directly proportional to the current flowing in the conductor, therefore the magnetic flux will be in-phase with the current in the primary. So it will look like cos(t) also.

Now for the tricky bit. Faradays law states that the voltage generated in a conductor is equal to the negative of the differential of the magnetic flux. So our voltage will look like -(differential(cos(t))). Which gives us -(-sin(t)) = sin(t). There are two things to note here, 1) We have the secondary the same polarity/in phase with the primary and 2) Faraday's law of induction only describes voltage.

So this is where your confusion is coming from, the reason we don't get two opposite current directions in the same half cycle is that faraday's law is describing the voltage generated in the secondary, not the current. Lenz' law is useful to try and determine what direction the current will be flowing as a result of this voltage.

• Actually, when you differentiate cos(t) you get -sin(t) and, because the induced voltage law has a minus in front of it i.e. V = -N dphi/dt, you get a positive sinewave voltage output. Lenz's law is about currents. I didn't down vote you either cause it was a simple mistake to make and you should fix it. Jul 14, 2023 at 13:24
• Thnx @Entropy , I've now got an intuition. Jul 15, 2023 at 5:23
• @Andyaka Nice catch, I've fixed it Jul 17, 2023 at 14:28