1
\$\begingroup\$

I am currently working on a project to develop an airborne ground penetrating radar - a payload to be put on a drone - we are aiming to develop a synthetic aperture ground penetrating radar of this type. As my background is in applied mathematics and not in anything practical, I want to partner with someone who has the relevant skills for this.

I am trying to understand what makes most sense to look for in an engineer to work with me on this project and would like your insights on this.

Of course I have a prioris but unfortunately no domain expertise. Based on my understanding of the field, I am focused on a few profiles and would like your feedback on these :

  • RF engineers for ground-based military grade radars
  • RF engineers for telecommunications
  • Electrical engineers working on remote sensing for space-based SARs

Any thoughts on how to refine my search? (I am based in France)

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Don't mess around -- buy the technology that you need. Find a company that has what you need, or, if your volume is high enough, that has something close to what you need and can be convinced to customize it for you. \$\endgroup\$
    – TimWescott
    Commented Oct 15, 2023 at 16:28

3 Answers 3

4
\$\begingroup\$

This is a pretty broad question. But I can tell you that your list of subject matter experts is very limited. Here's what we would have on a typical airborn radar program (and I'm probably leaving out a few).

  • Systems engineers to define and manage requirements
  • Systems engineers to develop the algorithms. This is where a background like your's in applied mathematics may come in.
  • Electrical engineers of various disciplines, including RF (analysis, circuit design), digital (board level, FPGA), and power
  • Mechanical engineers of various disciplines, including packaging, thermal, structural
  • Software engineer(s)
  • Test engineers
  • Manufacturing engineers
  • Reliability/maintainability engineer

Like I said, I probably left out a few.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ I mean, they do list 6 authors on that paper, and that's for a prototype, and those are people that can all access specific, relevant experience in their environment (like "why does my antenna not receive any signal? Oh well, I'll ask the guy running the antenna measurement chamber here at the institute"); that makes a huge difference compared to having to hire someone that needs to know or learn everything at once. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 15, 2023 at 14:19
  • \$\begingroup\$ I agree. I worked for a big company that had all that expertise in house, in multiple (East coast, West coast, Midwest) locations. So it was never a problem of not being to find the right expert, or having them on your team, assuming they weren't overloaded with work. \$\endgroup\$
    – SteveSh
    Commented Oct 15, 2023 at 14:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ If the audience is interested, I may post a comprehensive answer soon. \$\endgroup\$
    – Envidia
    Commented Oct 18, 2023 at 21:44
2
\$\begingroup\$

I am currently working on a project to develop an airborne ground penetrating radar - a payload to be put on a drone - we are aiming to develop a synthetic aperture ground penetrating radar

So, us engineers have a technical term for that: It's called "a very cool project" ;) But, it's definitely ambitious.

As my background is in applied mathematics and not in anything practical, I want to partner with someone who has the relevant skills for this.

Quick remark: not a freelancer consulting site. We're here for engineering questions, not for HR questions.

So, I'll interpret your question as

What are the relevant skills in the field of low-altitude airborne groundpenetrating SAR that I need to acquire to be able to work on a projectwhich might involve hiring a very expensive engineer to help on the project?

So, first of all, of course ground-penetrating radars are both subject and tools in research at universities and national research institutions – for example, German Aerospace Center (DLR) has a whole department dedicated to Remote Sensing Technology, stuffed full with engineers and scientists that do this stuff. Universities have institutes doing various types of SAR based observations. I'd recommend you check their publications to see which topics they are involved in, and check their teaching to see which skills you need to acquire! (or hire)

Generally, as everywhere, you're building a complex system. From the list you've posted, I'd say you're missing a couple really important aspects:

  • SAR needs very accurate flight control and modelling. As you can directly see from your math, it can only work if you can coherently add wavefronts, and that means your movement needs to be reliable enough between captures down to significantly sub-wavelength accuracy! So, you're missing skills in how to control flights, how to very accurately sense movement, and how to account for the errors that invariable happen. Luckily, you're the mathematician here, you get to do a lot of cool control theory (Laplace transforms, evolving matrix norms and numerics all over the place)!
  • if you look to the previous publication from the authors you refer to, you will find this photo of a system: Photo of the system
    Image source: Cerquera, Manuel Ricardo Pérez; Montaño, Julian David Colorado; Mondragón, Iván. 2017. "UAV for Landmine Detection Using SDR-Based GPR Technology". Robots Operating in Hazardous Environments. InTech. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69738

You'll notice a couple of things

  • antenna technology plays an important role
  • mechanical construction is a non-negligible aspect of this
  • geospatial modelling makes a difference, because someone needs to understand the data you're gathering
  • The thing flies an SDR device, and a PC-style computer. You need to be able to power, boot and operate that in air. You need computer skills.
  • The paper incorrectly identifies GNU Radio as Python program¹, but what they get right is that it's a tool to get the data handling of SDR problems right. You'll probably need to develop your own pulse compression, range cell migration mitigation and cross-correlation functionality. So, you'll need significant DSP skills, and experience with the type of SDR and software you'll use is going to be quite helpful

¹ It's not, all signal processing code was written in C++, you can however use it from Python, and I'm a bit more annoyed by this than I should be: this is really nice work they're doing! It's just that I've been the head GNU Radio maintainer and as someone who did his B.Sc. thesis on a very different type of radar, I know how many moving parts that one needs to understand can be in there, completely without involving flying around.

\$\endgroup\$
0
1
\$\begingroup\$

I recently started as a graduate in a radar team that has similar ambitions than yours (new technology, less experience in the field). In your case you will most likely get really comfortable with signal processing and software engineering. The math behind SAR is complex but nothing too crazy (until you actually need to make it work ;)).

From my point of view (EE) you want someone that worked with RF hardware before and has some knowledge of

  1. Hardware design, analog hardware, rf hardware
  2. RF basics (dB, S-parameters, network analyzers, antennas)

In the beginning testing things, conduct requirements, talk with subcontractors (for hardware) will be the most important part of the EE in the team.

Your project gets less complex if you can utilize COTS hardware like software defined radios.

Just my 2-cents :)

\$\endgroup\$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.