4
\$\begingroup\$

I directed my attention to a paper regarding the modeling of common-mode chokes. Within this paper, the authors structured the circuit in such a manner that they designated the core resistance (parallel to the inductor) as 2*Rp, and the capacitance to be equal to Cp/2. What is the rationale behind this approach? Furthermore, what alterations would occur to the same circuit if I were to design a multiple resonance circuit for a common-mode choke? enter image description here

Here's https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8094720 1: Characterization of Common-Mode Choke for Automotive Ethernet Networks enabling 100 Mbit/s

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ What's the rational? Why not?! \$\endgroup\$
    – Neil_UK
    Mar 5 at 18:03
  • \$\begingroup\$ According to Fig 6 it matches reality pretty well. \$\endgroup\$ Mar 5 at 18:05

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$

Typically, the resistances RP represent magnetic material losses and Cp the parasitic self-capacitances of the windings.

If you need to design a multiple-resonance circuit, you should have a more complete model. There are also leakage inductances and capacitances between choke inputs and outputs.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks you for your valuable feedback ... \$\endgroup\$
    – Alaska
    Mar 6 at 6:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.