2
\$\begingroup\$

I am seeking an explanation of how conducted emissions on telecom lines are measured. The frequencies of interest are at 150kHz to roughly 850kHz. The size of the unit is 30cm by 30cm by 15cm. The enclosure of the EUT is metallic.

Specifically, I would like to understand the following:

  1. How noise travels within the system, obviously through the wires?

  2. How this noise is conducted to the Impedance Stabilization Network (ISN). Assuming the system has a chassis ground connected to the same reference ground plane as the ISN.

Here is what the system looks like. The chassis is a metallic enclosure that is grounded to the RGP (Reference Ground Plane) using a ground strap. The ISN is connected to the same RGP. Since we are measuring the LAN port, i.e. Asymmetric port I am expecting that we measure a Common-mode noise.

When performing the measurements, we do not see noise when the system is grounded, and we see noise when the system is floating. That seems to contradict our expectations since again we expect to see Common mode noise.

This is the setup where the unit is grounded. enter image description here

This is the setup with the unit floating.

enter image description here

EDIT 2: The unit has two grounding points on the chassis. I followed Tim's advice and i shorted them both with a ground strap.

Here is the system floating. enter image description here

This is with one of the grounding points connected to the RGP. Same thing happened when both grounding points were shorted to the RGP. enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
7
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ How conducted noise travels in telecom lines? Isn't it in the name? ->Conducted<- \$\endgroup\$
    – MrGerber
    Commented Jul 9 at 14:51
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Because it's wired to it--? I assume you're after a non-trivial answer, but you'll have to explain your specific confusion so that we can address it. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 9 at 15:59
  • \$\begingroup\$ ok i will edit the question to make it clearer \$\endgroup\$
    – DRF
    Commented Jul 9 at 16:39
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Are you looking at the ISN with a scope? You'll probably get a lot of noise if the scope is floating. \$\endgroup\$
    – Voltage Spike
    Commented Jul 9 at 17:22
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Can you expand the diagram to indicate all connections each block has, and show two versions, one with ground, other without? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 9 at 17:37

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$

Presumably, no CM current in the Ethernet port means no ground current, and lifting it shouldn't make any difference.

This is an unverified assumption, however. A current clamp on the ground connection would prove it.

You don't say what schematic, layout or assembly is, so that leaves some possibilities still.

One possibility is the enclosure is multi-part, and a noise source is driving one part, while the ground acts as a filter ground reference point:

Modified diagram

Presumably, this is easily solved by joining the pieces together, shorting out the offending source. Perhaps the enclosure itself is plastic, and it's a multi-board assembly, but in that case the PCB ground planes serve as enclosure panels, and need to be joined, to the same end. Grounded mounting holes and metal standoffs would be a typical method; a metal-lined enclosure is another (via self-adhesive foil or metal spray). Ferrite beads or CMCs on the connecting cables might also be useful.

Such a mechanism falls under the topic of enclosure port emissions, anything emitted from the EUT by internal radiation, or capacitive or inductive coupling. The coupling factor depends on the relative size of source and victim; a small EUT (few inches, say) might be constructed in such a way but not exceed limits, while a 0.5m+ box might handily do so towards the upper end of the band (10s MHz). Problems will be more apparent in radiated, where the panel or loop elements act as antennas, radiating energy.

More generally: a panel might act as a patch antenna or dipole, being "electrically short" at low frequencies, thus being in the asymptotic cutoff region where gain rises at 20dB/decade. At the low end, this can provide enough attenuation to pass, but at the high end [of the band], or for larger panels, emissions can be problematic. And similarly for magnetic sources (loops). Up into the radiated band, such antennas continue to rise in gain, until topping out with whatever resonances their structures produce.


EMC is a complex, interconnected topic, and EMC problems are holistic in nature. There is generally very little that can be said about a problem without also completely describing the setup and environment. Keep in mind that this answer only extends as far as it does: a possible explanation, for an incompletely described phenomenon. As one adds details to the question, the answer can change radically, as various other effects come to dominate. This answer is not a diagnosis, nor can a diagnosis be given based on such meager information.

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • \$\begingroup\$ I included information regarding frequencies of interest as well as EUT size. \$\endgroup\$
    – DRF
    Commented Jul 10 at 19:00
  • \$\begingroup\$ Hi Tim, I appreciate your input, I updated the question even further. Is there more I can do in order to figure out what is going on with the system? \$\endgroup\$
    – DRF
    Commented Jul 12 at 13:52
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Keep in mind: I'm not here to answer your underlying problems, I can only answer what is written here. If you are after a diagnosis, please say so. I have answered what was [originally] asked, which was not diagnostic, but phenomenal. If you are able to show the EUT in detail (schematics, PCB layout, assembly diagrams, photos, test environment), a diagnosis may be possible, but note that such an edit would invalidate my answer (and I'm dubious whether the latest edits already do), ask this in a new question instead. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 12 at 15:19
  • \$\begingroup\$ i understand thank you \$\endgroup\$
    – DRF
    Commented Jul 12 at 16:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.