2
\$\begingroup\$

This is intended to be a voltage multiplier.

Can anyone check if my connections are correct or accurate to my schematic?

enter image description here

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
10
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ What's this circuit supposed to do? \$\endgroup\$
    – Lundin
    Commented Nov 18 at 11:35
  • \$\begingroup\$ That is VERY hard on the brain (mine anyway :-)). I could draw it out more comventionally BUT I suggest it would be far better if you can draw it with left to right flow and with ground at the bottom. At a glance it looks like you have mixed "live" and ground nodes in various places so that you do not get follow through pumping action. || Imagine a square wave in. Starting at the oscillator raise and lower C2 input and record what happens. Then look at right hand end of C2 and do the same. Co=ntinue down chain. I think your chain does not exist. \$\endgroup\$
    – Russell McMahon
    Commented Nov 18 at 11:41
  • \$\begingroup\$ || ALSO add some description at the start or people will quickly close this question. \$\endgroup\$
    – Russell McMahon
    Commented Nov 18 at 11:41
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Lundin Voltage multiplier (I hope :-) ) \$\endgroup\$
    – Russell McMahon
    Commented Nov 18 at 11:41
  • \$\begingroup\$ Snow Fairy24 Please check my added desciption, change if wrong AND regardless, add a bit more information. \$\endgroup\$
    – Russell McMahon
    Commented Nov 18 at 11:45

4 Answers 4

6
\$\begingroup\$

The "black input line" (Labeled "-" on your breadboard) should connect directly to four components, but I only count three.

Trick is this: while a solderless breadboard cannot be connected in arbitrary ways, you can always rearrange your schematic such that it reflects the connections on the breadboard. So, use the schematic capture software used to produce your schematic, and rearrange that, without removing connections or adding new ones between components that were formerly connected, until you get something you can plug into a circuit board, directly.

In more technical terms, while a schematic and your fritzing breadboard drawing are both representations of a circuit, the circuit functionality is defined by its connectivity graph, i.e., a list of which pins are connected to each other, and which components have which pin. You can rotate your schematic, you can stretch or shorten lines and do many things to your schematic, whithout affecting that graph. Only if your schematic and the breadboard have the same graph can the breadboard show the same circuit as your schematic.

So. First step, label the components in your breadboard image. That solves 90% of confusion. Then, for every pin in your schematic, find it in your breadboard, and make sure it's connected to exactly the same pins as in your schematic. Mark all the connections you've checked in green in your schematic, directly after checking. Mark all the components you've checked in green. When your whole schematic is green, you've verified that you've built an equivalent breadboard.

\$\endgroup\$
4
\$\begingroup\$

This is the circuit you have created on breadboard:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

Which probably could be drawn better but it gives me a 404 error when I try to edit it (posted too quickly) and it's not worth doing again as the breadboard has no designators so I have no idea what is supposed to be what.

However, you can see clearly that your breadboard circuit is not what is in your schematic

\$\endgroup\$
3
\$\begingroup\$

Breadboard layout

Figure 1. First error.

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

Figure 2. What you have made.

There are no component designators on your breadboard layout so I don't know which component is which but it is clear that you have connected three diodes in a parallel / anti-parallel arrangement which doesn't exist in your schematic.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

I suggest you rip-up and retry, a common term coined in the early days of PCB layout tools.

  1. Daisy-chain all the diodes in a string horizontally. You can stand them up "Manhatten style" as the Japanese started in miniature radios or like this /////.
  2. Orient all the polarized Caps the same way using the BLUE rail to GND and RED rail to SIG GEN.
  3. Note I have used 3 stages but show the repeatability of 2 diodes and 2 caps.
  4. I have also included an interactive load switch and plotted power & voltage.

My Simulation link

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.