8
\$\begingroup\$

Based on: Is there a dual of the transformer?

http://i.stack.imgur.com/xY7KD.gif

The picture of the capacitor inside another capacitor seems viable to me. If a transformer is two inductors with a common magnetic field, its dual would be two capacitors with a common electric field. The voltage transfer ratio would be a function of the relative capacitance of the two capacitors, again like a transformer and the relative number of turns.

So is this done? If not, why not? Would it just not transfer energy, or would it work but be inefficient in some way? Size? Speed? Heat?

What would be the properties of a capacitor actually constructed this way?

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ One flaw of your statement is "a common electric field" if the plate spacing on C1 is sufficiently small vs. the size of the plates the E-Field in the interior of C1 will not be unduly influenced by the main E-field. The total field will be influenced by fringing especially since the presence of a conductor forces a iso-potential. Even if you put a block of dielectric in the gap the field inside of the dielectric will be different than outside. \$\endgroup\$ – placeholder Aug 17 '13 at 20:23
2
\$\begingroup\$

I don't think such a capacitor is much different from this:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

This isn't really like a transformer. In an ideal transformer, \$V_{1} = n\cdot V_{R1}\$, regardless of frequency. That's not the case here, as can be seen by simple AC analysis. At high frequencies, C2 shorts out R1, so as \$f\to\infty\$, \$V_{R1}\to 0V\$.

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ After almost a year of mind-wringing, I've come to realize that Phil is entirely correct. There is zero difference between the device I asked about and the circuit Phil's drawn here. I've answered the original question about the dual of a transformer, if anyone's interested in further thoughts. electronics.stackexchange.com/a/115581/7523 \$\endgroup\$ – Stephen Collings Jun 16 '14 at 13:37
1
\$\begingroup\$

Let's assume for the purpose of theoretical discussion that your outer capacitor consists of two parallel plates connected trough a voltage source, and the inner capacitor consists of two parallel plates connected through resistor (it is what shown in your diagram, but said aloud).

DC analysis:

First we need to understand what happens in DC conditions.

Imagine that the outer capacitor is charged to some voltage and the inner capacitor have zero voltage across the load resistor when inserted in between the plates of the outer one. Now we want to know what happens to the inner capacitor when the system gets to its steady state?

It is clear that the current trough the load resistor must be zero (otherwise no conservation of charge). This means that there is no potential difference between the plates of the inner capacitor. This, in turn, implies that there is no electric field inside the inner capacitor. Does this mean that there is no charge on its plates? The answer is NO - there is charge transfer takes place through the load resistance and the transferred charge accumulates on the plates and neutralizes the external electric field.

From this DC analysis we see that there is charge transfer between the plates of the inner capacitor and the induced current through the load resistor.

AC analysis:

From the above discussion we know that there is induced current once the induced charge on the inner capacitor is not neutralizing the external electric field. This means that if the external field would oscillate, so will the charge on the inner capacitor. This gives rise to an oscillating current through the load resistor.

It is clear that the magnitude of the induced current will be proportional to the magnitude of oscillating electric field.

It is also clear that it will be proportional to inner capacitor's area (neglecting the fringing of the electric field), the separation between the plates and the dielectric constant between the plates. These three are equivalent to saying that the induced current will be proportional to inner capacitor's capacitance. Note: this is true while the inner capacitor is physically smaller than the external one.

Note that due to the load resistance, the charge transfer is not instant, but follows the usual capacitor's characteristic, having a time constant of RC. This means that there is intrinsic low pass behavior to this system.

Conclusion:

You are correct - this setup can be employed for transferring energy.

Why isn't it used? Well, I can only speculate here. My guesses are:

  • Assuming that dielectrics are the same for both outer and inner capacitors, this setup may be used for reducing the voltage only.
  • The intrinsic low pass behavior may be not desirable.
  • The control over capacitors' areas is more complicated than the control over number of windings in inductors.
  • It is very easy to ensure that almost 100% of primary's magnetic field passes through secondary windings. It is more complicated with capacitors and the electric field.
  • In order to increase efficiency and reduce physical size you want the capacitors to be thin (small gap between plates), but this results in lower breakdown voltage.

And I'm sure that there are more reasons. Also I'm completely sure that there are some specialized applications where this technique is employed.

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.