8
\$\begingroup\$

I'd like to create the classic game of Simon Says utilising nothing but logic circuits, LEDs and ICs, no Microcontrollers like the Arduino.

I would like to use 4 LEDs and 4 Tactile Switches for this circuit.

I'm doing this as an educational exercise for myself, I'm not studying electronics however I am studying Computer Science.

I understand that I will need several components including decade counters and 555 timers.

However my question is, how am I able to decide which LEDs to display in a random sequence? I understand I can decade counters/Flip Flops to store the sequence in memory.

\$\endgroup\$
5
\$\begingroup\$

Generally to generate "random-ish" numbers in hardware (for amusement-grade purposes), you can do something such as take a mechanism which is somewhat unpredictable and combine it with a mechanism which is predictable, but not obvious.

For example, if you have a counter running quickly, and sample the output whenever the user presses a button (such as while playing back the previous sequence) that will be somewhat random, since they may take varying amounts of time. But someone gaming the system by pressing buttons very quickly might tend to get the same few values over and over again (though if the clock is in the MHz range that may not be a realistic concern).

Conversely, you can use a Linear Feedback Shift Register (Wikipedia) which feeds a combinatorial function of the current state a shift register back into it's input, to generate a sequence that is not readily obvious to humans, even though its output for the same inputs will actually be entirely predictable. Used by itself, this wouldn't be a good idea either since it would give the same sequences every play of the game and so quickly be memorized by a repeat user.

But, if you combine two methods, such as using the timer to get an unpredictable starting value, and then using the linear feedback shift register to mix it up (or perhaps letting the LFSR free run against a fast clock, and sampling it based on user interaction) you should be able to get something random enough for an amusement game.

Another source you could try would be the low-order bits of an analog-to-digital converter.

Whatever you do, you'll probably want to simulate it (and your overall system design as well) before you build the circuit. The project is complex enough that using a small FPGA or larger CPLD may be worthwhile.

And finally keep in mind that historically, the original Simon game apparently used an early microprocessor, the TMS1000. Generally complex sequential operations can be more efficiently implemented that way, with state machines chosen only for problems which are simple, must run extremely fast, or are learning substitutes for eventual work on such problems.

Edit:

http://www.waitingforfriday.com/index.php/Reverse_engineering_an_MB_Electronic_Simon_game

Contains some interesting observations, including an eventual change from the TMS1000 to what may be a custom labeled version thereof. More relevant to your question, it suggests that the original generated its random numbers by sampling a free running counter when the user pressed a button ;-)

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ I wonder how many chips, or how complex a CPLD, would be required to build a "processor" that could handle a game similar to the Simon brand unit using a "program" stored in a ROM? My guess would be that it could be done with less than a dozen off-the-shelf discrete chips and a ROM 32Kx8 or smaller; the more chips, the smaller the ROM that would be required. If one didn't need "game 2", a software-based feedback shift register could handle any length of "sequence" with 40 or so bits of storage (when picking a color sequence, run a 20 bit LFSR until a button is hit, then copy it... \$\endgroup\$ – supercat Oct 21 '13 at 23:08
  • \$\begingroup\$ ...to a backup register. Then play the sequence generated by that LFSR, copy the backup register back to the LFSR, and wait for the user press the buttons in that sequence. \$\endgroup\$ – supercat Oct 21 '13 at 23:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.