# UHF RFID Read Ranges

I'm experimenting with UHF RFID. I have a setup that's working but my read range is only 1 - 2 feet. This is the equipment I'm using, it's all quite cheap, I don't mind spending more to increase the read range but I'm not sure which components would be most important to upgrade.

Tag: Key Tag UHF RFID tag , EPC Gen2 (900MHz) (the little yellow ones on the cutedigi website)

I could upgrade to an antenna with 9dB gain, or even to a linear polarized 10dB antenna, I can't control the angle of the tags though so I'm thinking circular polarization may give me better performance. I don't know if an extra dB will make much difference though.

Alternatively, maybe I'm better to pursue higher-sensitivity, larger tags or a higher output reader.

I'd really appreciate any suggestions on this. Thanks.

• What sort of range are you looking for. Also it would help if you could (briefly of course) describe the technology or method in which the tags become (or are) powered rather than have people (like me) searching thru links for that sort of basic stuff – Andy aka Sep 20 '13 at 17:44
• There are many parameters affecting the read range of passive tags, starting from the reader (output power, sensitivity) Antenna, The tags themselves, the object the tags were attached to and local regulations. Can you add more details? – Lior Bilia Sep 20 '13 at 20:40
• Thanks. I'd like to get a range of around 10 feet. The reader module is rated at max 20dBm. The tags are passive - they're powered by the field from the antenna - no battery in the tag. I'm testing by just holding the tag in front of the antenna but eventually the tags will be around a persons wrist or ankle. – Bruce Sep 20 '13 at 20:58

I'm going to examine the maths of transmitting power from a point source (the reader antenna) and assume the passive tag has an antenna that can pick-up, rectify and re-use a fraction of this power. This doesn't consider near-field effects/benefits (these may save the day but my gut feeling suggests they won't).

The reader antenna is pumping out +20dBm - that's a power of 100mW and assuming that is transmitted in all directions and your tag's antenna has an effective aperture$^1$ of 50 sq cm, the question is what amount of power can the tag "liberate" from the "ether"?

At 1 foot (30.4cm) distant, the 100mW output is shared over every sq cm of a sphere of radius 30.4cm. The spherical surface area is $4\pi r^2$ = 11,613 sq cm.

If the antenna has an effective aperture of 50 sq cm it will receive 100mW x $\dfrac{50}{11613}$ = 0.43mW.

It doesn't sound much but, this power can be stored (and accumulated) for about a second or so and build up enough energy in the tag's circuits enabling it to vomit a short response. That's all that is needed for this to work.

Let's make life easier - lets say the reader antenna (transmitting power for the tag) has a gain of 10dB over an isotropic antenna (an isotropic antenna produces a spherical field as in my earlier noodlings).

Now, we can say that the power received is 10 times larger at 4.3mW and this is beginning to sound reasonable but, the transmit field is much more restricted in shape but hopefully this isn't a problem.

As a side note 4.3mW across a 50 ohm load equates to an RMS voltage of nearly half a volt RMS and of course energy harvesting technology could easily reap enough energy to make a short but useful tag transmission.

What about getting it to work at 10 foot (304cm)? The effective power is now 1W because we are using an antenna with 10dBi gain. The area of the sphere is now 1.16 million sq cm and the fractional power hitting the tag antenna (50 sq cm effective aperture) is a measly 43 micro watts.

Will this work? Could it work? If the 43 $\mu watts$ were received across a 50 ohm resistor the voltage would be about 46mV RMS - I don't think any energy harvesting circuit will liberate anything from this.

Conclusion - A passive tag won't work at ten foot - it would need to be powered by a small button-cell and it's MCU would need to wake up every 1 or 2 seconds to see if there was something potentially being received.

$^1$ The effective area of a tag's antenna is just an estimate on my part based on a little experience and the frequency the system it is operating on. Theoretically an isotropic antenna operating at 900MHz will have an aperture of $\dfrac{\lambda^2}{4\pi}$ which is $\dfrac{0.1111^2}{4\pi}$ which equals 8.84 x $10^{-3}$ sq metres or 88.4 sq cm. I've assumed the actual antenna's aperture is 50cm. This is somewhat less than an isotropic antenna despite the liklihood that the tag antenna will likely have gain/directionality BUT it will also have a poor efficiency because of it's tiny size and construction. A "real" quarter wave dipole antenna will be 8cm long which obviously is unattainable in a small tag.

## protected by KortukSep 21 '13 at 15:45

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?