1
\$\begingroup\$

I'm trying to use the rail-to-rail instrumental amplifier AD623. Here the datasheet.

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

First experiment: AD623 set as a voltage follower. Gain = 1 obtained by removing the Rg resistance between Rg- and Rg+ pin.

Everything goes right until I reach 4.3 V (read with VM1 and VM2) 4.3 V is the maximum amplifier output even when the difference between inputs is 5V. But this is a rail-to-rail amplifier...

Second experiment: AD623 set with gain = 2 (using a 100K resistor in according to datasheet).

Everything goes right until I reach 2 V of difference between inputs.(read with VM1) In this case 4.0 V is the maximum amplifier output.

Under this value the amplifier works good (if in input I have 1V in output I read 2V)

Other information:

  • +Vs = +5V
  • -Vs = GND
  • REF = GND

How is it possible?

Can anyone help me?

Thanks for help (and sorry for my poor english)

\$\endgroup\$
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Are you providing a path for input bias current? It's not clear that you are from the schematic you provide. See page 19 of the data sheet. \$\endgroup\$ – Alfred Centauri Oct 12 '13 at 2:20
  • \$\begingroup\$ you are right! I completely forgot the bias current. 3 hours ago there was another answer below, but now is disappear. They say that AD623 isn't a rail-to-rail Amplifier. The presence of bias current can produce, in this case, a difference between theorical and real output of few mV, it's true? \$\endgroup\$ – Grigno Oct 12 '13 at 11:51
  • \$\begingroup\$ I think the now removed answer was that the input isn't rail to rail but that wouldn't account for your result with gain 2 so I'm guessing that's why it was removed. \$\endgroup\$ – Alfred Centauri Oct 12 '13 at 12:27
  • \$\begingroup\$ Did you figure it out? \$\endgroup\$ – Anthony Dec 30 '17 at 17:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Anthony I think so, that was an old project and, at the end, was a success. In the 2nd prototipe the problem was no longer present. I think the problem was a simple mistake but after 5 year I don’t remember... I should have written it here. Are you experience the same problem? \$\endgroup\$ – Grigno Dec 30 '17 at 18:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.