Power transformers are rated by percent impedance. A 5% transformer, when loaded to full spec secondary current, will show a ~5% deviation from nominal output voltage.

What is the percent impedance of a typical residential power transformer, and why is that the typical value? Or is there a typical answer?

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Power transformers (at sub kw levels, at least) are usually rated by percent regulation, not impedance. Impedance is part of the loss, but the magnetic circuit has losses too. \$\endgroup\$ – Brian Drummond Jan 16 '14 at 18:33
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @BrianDrummond: Power transformers are always rated by percent impedance on rated power base - this is part of the basic information appearing on every transformer's nameplate. The expression in terms of "percent impedance" is found to be convenient for power engineering calculations. \$\endgroup\$ – Li-aung Yip Jan 16 '14 at 19:29
  • \$\begingroup\$ To clarify, when I say "power transformer", I am talking about distribution transformers, where the rated power is measured in kVA. \$\endgroup\$ – Li-aung Yip Jan 16 '14 at 20:00
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Li-aung Yip : I defer to your expertise in power electrical engineering; the context wasn't exactly clear from the question. \$\endgroup\$ – Brian Drummond Jan 16 '14 at 20:28
  • \$\begingroup\$ @BrianDrummond: That's OK, I have no idea about electronics engineering. :) \$\endgroup\$ – Li-aung Yip Jan 17 '14 at 3:41

I can't speak to American/ANSI standards, but in Australia we use AS/NZS standard 60076.5-2012 Power Transformers - Ability to withstand short-circuit as a guideline for the absolute minimum impedance of power transformers. Note AS/NZS 60076.5 is equivalent to IEC 60076.5.

Table 1 of that standard gives absolute minimum percent impedances for various transformer sizes. I cannot reproduce the entire table, but the relevant part for you is:

Table 1 - Recognised minimum values of short circuit impedance for
          transformers with two separate windings

          Short circuit impedance at rated current

Rated Power (kVA) | Minimum short circuit impedance (%)
   25 - 630       | 4 %
  631 - 1,250     | 5 %
1,251 - 2,500     | 6 %
     ...          | ...

Noting that most residential transformers will be in the 200kVA - 2,500 kVA range. (Pole top transformers can be as large as 500 kVA; past that, up to 2,500 kVA, they tend to be pad-mount on the ground.)

Why are these the typical values?

The reason this information is found in the standard about "ability to withstand short circuit", which is an odd place to find it, is because the transformer impedance is important in limiting the current through the transformer under fault conditions.

A minimum impedance limit implies a upper limit on the through-fault current, hence a limit on the maximum energy dissipation and dynamic force under fault conditions.

The maximum energy dissipation and dynamic forces directly influence the design of the transformer. For instance, AS60076.5 mandates that the transformer must be able to withstand two seconds at maximum through-fault current without sustaining damage from heating, so the conductor thicknesses and so forth must be chosen to accomplish this.

At a guess, the exact values found in Table 1 were chosen because it was found (experimentally) that these were the lowest impedances it was possible to specify, while still having a sufficiently reliable and robust transformer.

Can transformers be ordered with "non standard" impedances?

Transformers can be ordered with a different impedance than the minimum set forth in AS 60076.5, which is only a suggestion. It is common to order transformers with a higher impedance, so the fault levels on the LV system are reduced. I have seen 2,500 kVA transformers ordered with impedance of 12%, which is double the minimum standard impedance, for fault limiting purposes.

It is not common to ask for a transformer with less than the standard impedance, as such a transformer will have a very high LV fault level, which is bad for equipment and personnel safety. Additionally, the high fault level will tend to make the transformer self-destruct under fault. As such, transformers with less than minimum impedance would only be ordered if you really knew what you were doing, and you were willing to waive some of the fault-withstand requirements set forth in AS60076.5.

  • \$\begingroup\$ +1, nice answer! Note: Transformers with lower impedance are sometimes desirable on industrial sites that have equipment that is dependent on reliable power supply and therefore have installed UPSs. The short circuit capacity of such equipment is usually low. In case of a fault downstream of the UPS, a high impedance transformer may reduce the short circuit current enough to cause problems with selectivity for relays and breakers. Therefore, in systems with a low short circuit capacity, low impedance transformers are used to make sure the current is high enough in case of a fault. \$\endgroup\$ – Stewie Griffin Jul 11 '14 at 7:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Li-aungYip ... so is the % impedance the same thing as % regulation? Or would it be, if other asumptions (what) were made? Does a 5% impedance mean a s/c current of 20x rated full load current? Is it affected soley by winding resistance, or are there elements of lower than unity coupling from primary to secondary? Experienced elctronic engineer with no power distribution experience seeks clarification of terms. Thanks. \$\endgroup\$ – Neil_UK Feb 21 '17 at 6:04
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Neil_UK Not enough space to answer in comments. Start a new question, then ping me an email at stackexchange@penwatch.net. \$\endgroup\$ – Li-aung Yip Feb 22 '17 at 7:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Li-aungYip OK, thanks for the offer, but if it's too complicated to fit in comments, then I think I'll just stay ignorant, far easier. \$\endgroup\$ – Neil_UK Feb 22 '17 at 7:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.