2
\$\begingroup\$

Say I have a parallel plate capacitor that has a vacuum between the plates and has electric energy U. If I then add in a dielectric between the plates while the capacitor is charged, the electric energy increases since the dielectric constant increases.

But where does the additional energy come from? Doesn't that violate conservation of energy? I understand that the energy is increased because the permittivity of the dielectric increases, but doesn't it still violate conservation of energy?

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Q=CV. If Q is unchanged and C increases, V will decrease. Energy (U) = 0.5C*V^2 so will decrease as MathEE says. \$\endgroup\$
    – user16324
    Feb 4, 2014 at 15:44

3 Answers 3

7
\$\begingroup\$

We're assuming the charge \$Q\$ is constant (the capacitor is not connected to anything).

The energy is less with the dielectric inserted, by a factor of 1/\$\epsilon_R\$, since \$U = \$ \$Q^2 \over {2\cdot C}\$ and \$ C = \$ \$ C_0 \cdot \epsilon_R\$

It does not go into dielectric absorption, the energy decreases even with a perfect dielectric.

You can extract mechanical energy from the dielectric insertion operation (it's pulled into the gap), and that is where the energy goes.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Now I have visions of a dielectric coil gun! \$\endgroup\$
    – scld
    Feb 4, 2014 at 17:58
4
\$\begingroup\$

Firstly, you have your conclusion backwards regarding how the energy changes when you increase the dielectric constant, AKA permittivity. For an ideal parallel-plate capacitor the capacitance is:

$$ C = \frac{\varepsilon A}{d} $$

If you insert a material between the plates with a higher permittivity (\$\varepsilon\$), then capacitance goes up. The energy stored in the capacitor (\$W\$) is:

$$ W = {Q^2 \over C} $$

If we are assuming charge (\$Q\$) is constant because the capacitor isn't connected to anything, then as capacitance goes up, stored energy does down.

$$ W = \frac{Q^2}{\frac{\varepsilon A}{d}} = \frac{Q^2d}{\varepsilon A} \\ \lim_{\varepsilon \to \infty} \frac{Q^2d}{\varepsilon A} = 0$$

So let's just reverse your question: what if the capacitor has some relatively high permittivity dielectric in it, then you remove it? Now the energy stored in the capacitor increases. Where's this extra energy come from?

The answer is simple: from the work you do removing the dielectric. If the dielectric is a sheet of something that you could pull out from between the capacitor plates, you would find that it's attracted to the plates, like a magnet. Of course it's not magnetic forces causing this attraction, but electric forces.

If you don't lose energy to anything like friction, all the work you did removing the dielectric from the capacitor remains available as the attraction of the dielectric back towards the space between the capacitor plates. That is, if you let it go, it will be sucked back into place, and everything will be as it was before you started. This attraction of the dielectric to the capacitor is a potential energy.

It might help to realize that as you remove the dielectric, the capacitance decreases, and the voltage must then increase. Since the charge is held constant, but this same charge now has a higher potential difference (voltage), there's more energy in the capacitor. The quantity of charge is the same, but by decreasing the permittivity you have separated the charge more. This takes work, like stretching a rubber band.

It might also help to think of this system in terms of something more familiar, like magnets. Say you have a horseshoe magnet, with an iron bar across the poles. When you pull the iron bar away, the energy stored in the magnet's field increases, and you put the energy there by pulling the bar.

\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

The energy decreases.

If K is the dielectric constant and U_0 is the original stored energy then after insertion the energy is U = U_0/K. Assuming K > 1, the energy has decreased.

The energy is lost to rotating and separating the molecular dipoles in the dielectric material so that they line up with the electric field. Heat energy will dissipate from this aligning process depending on how strongly the molecules interact.

\$\endgroup\$
6
  • \$\begingroup\$ Power \$ \ne \$ energy. \$\endgroup\$ Feb 4, 2014 at 15:57
  • \$\begingroup\$ If I then remove the dielectric again, how does the energy come back if it has escaped as heat? \$\endgroup\$
    – dfg
    Feb 4, 2014 at 16:31
  • \$\begingroup\$ It takes energy to remove the dielectric. \$\endgroup\$
    – SomeEE
    Feb 4, 2014 at 16:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ It is the dipoles aligning with the electric field which creates the force which draws in the dielectric, as Spehro mentioned in his answer. \$\endgroup\$
    – SomeEE
    Feb 4, 2014 at 16:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ I'm not sure I agree with " This energy usually dissipates as heat." Were that true, wouldn't any capacitor subject to AC get really hot? Wouldn't transmission lines just be dummy loads? I think it's only true if the dielectric is extremely lossy, which is usually not the case. \$\endgroup\$
    – Phil Frost
    Feb 4, 2014 at 19:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.