3
\$\begingroup\$

I've developing an LED fixture for my aquarium to grow plants. To do so, I've selected several high powered LED's. I'm currently considering driving them with LM317's because I know how to use those and they're simple. I'm not the most skilled with electronics. What is the ideal way to drive high current LEDs?

The LED's I've picked out are these specs:

2 (in parallel) 700mA @ 33V Luxeon K LED 12UP Warm White
3 (in series) 1.2A @ 8.55V Cree XTE 3UP Royal Blue, 25.65V total
2 (in series) 700mA @7.2V Luxeon Rebel 3UP Deep Red, 14.4V total

\$\endgroup\$
7
  • \$\begingroup\$ Please note, I'm looking for something inexpensive. \$\endgroup\$
    – Malfist
    Commented Feb 7, 2014 at 4:03
  • \$\begingroup\$ Growing plants under the spectrum of LED light it is not an issue? \$\endgroup\$
    – GR Tech
    Commented Feb 7, 2014 at 4:34
  • \$\begingroup\$ No, I'm matching them with chlorophyll's absolution spectrum: biologie.uni-hamburg.de/b-online/e24/3.htm \$\endgroup\$
    – Malfist
    Commented Feb 7, 2014 at 4:37
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ I would not use parallel (you can't easily be sure that the LEDs will divide the current equally). You could consider a switching constant current source, with as many LEDs in series that you can manage with a commonly available DC source. Otherwise an LM317 is not a bad idea (especially if the heat can be used to heat the aquarium?) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 7, 2014 at 7:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ LED drive (especially for these high power parts) MUST be constant current. LM317 as a CC source is OK if Vin is not too much higher than output. || A smps (switched mode power supply) / buck converter/ switching converter is "best". || "Easiest" choice (what is best ? :-) ) is to use an LED CC (constant current) driver from eg ebay. These are cheaper than you can build them for. || The 'trick' is to match current needs and place these in series so you need only one driver for that "string" PROVIDED THAT you can share the same current. \$\endgroup\$
    – Russell McMahon
    Commented Feb 7, 2014 at 11:04

4 Answers 4

2
\$\begingroup\$

An LM317-based solution is probably the simpliest one if heatsink and extra power consumption is not a problem. It can also be turned into an advantage if you need to warm up water in your aquarium.

A better solution is to use a single-chip PWM controller, a power MOSFET and an inductor to drive the LEDs. A UC3843 and an IRF540 may suit you well.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ What would be a single chip PWM controller? I've used the LM317 successfully when used as a current source. \$\endgroup\$
    – Jiminion
    Commented Dec 6, 2014 at 6:37
1
\$\begingroup\$

Linear Technology do a series of very useful chips, and they do chips with three independant LED controls but these are not capable of supplying the current for the OP's needs. LT do a bunch of single LED-string chips though: -

  • The LT3795 looks pretty useful and costs about £4. It can work from 4.5V up to over 100V.
  • The LT3756 is a bit cheaper but would also do the job.
  • The LT3956 is used mainly for white LEDs in car headlights but would do the job - it works across a good range of input voltages too. It also costs about £3.

The above are all ~90% efficient switching regulators that control current to several LEDs in series and are suitable for one string of LEDs only. You don't have to provide a big supply voltage to these parts - they can boost the supply up to whatever is needed to get the right current through the LEDs but, you do need to be able to provide power so, if you need 25.6 volts at 1.2A for the blue LEDs in series and your supply is only 12V, it will be called on to provide over 2.5A.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

The trick in using an LM317 is to trick it into being a constant current supply, rather than constant voltage. And if you need LED strings in parallel, the 317 is cheap enough that you can use one per LED string; the major cost is the heatsink whether you use one LM317 or several.

Figure 43 of the datasheet shows how, though for 0.33A you would multiply the sense resistor by 3 (3.6R) rated at 2W.

This will waste some power, though (a) you asked for inexpensive and simple, and (b) as has been pointed out, an aquarium offers possibilities for water cooling!

\$\endgroup\$
-1
\$\begingroup\$

LM317 is a linear regulator. LEDs are non-linear.

You need constant current, so either an analogue buck/boost converter circuit or the uC-controlled equivalent.

A Buck Converter

R is the load, your LED.

The BuckPuck is a common off-the-shelf solution; you could get one of these to run the lights whilst you design something bespoke.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ LM317's make good current sources. Vin to Vin_pin. Connect Vout_pin to Ref_pin via resistor R1. Take CC output FROM REF PIN! Icc = 1.25V/R1 - as the regulator regulates its output across the resistor and the current used to do this is then the desired output. I said that V_LM317 = 1.25V - look at data sheet and decide what value to use. ] \$\endgroup\$
    – Russell McMahon
    Commented Feb 7, 2014 at 10:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.