Skip to main content
Removed unnecessary thanks. Show thanks by upvoting and accepting answers.
Source Link
JYelton
  • 34.9k
  • 34
  • 147
  • 272

I'm trying to perform FFT for large set of samples,


Sampling Rate : 1 MHZ

No. of Samples Captured : 1 Million (1 sec duration)


currently what I'm doing is, I've added zero padding so that it matches to 2^n, and now the total number of samples are 1048576 (2^20) and then I perform FFT. This approach seemed to take long.

I'm just wondering if there's any efficient way to do this? (Please note that at this stage, I'm not particular about the frequency resolution)

Many Thanks for your time..:)

I'm trying to perform FFT for large set of samples,


Sampling Rate : 1 MHZ

No. of Samples Captured : 1 Million (1 sec duration)


currently what I'm doing is, I've added zero padding so that it matches to 2^n, and now the total number of samples are 1048576 (2^20) and then I perform FFT. This approach seemed to take long.

I'm just wondering if there's any efficient way to do this? (Please note that at this stage, I'm not particular about the frequency resolution)

Many Thanks for your time..:)

I'm trying to perform FFT for large set of samples,


Sampling Rate : 1 MHZ

No. of Samples Captured : 1 Million (1 sec duration)


currently what I'm doing is, I've added zero padding so that it matches to 2^n, and now the total number of samples are 1048576 (2^20) and then I perform FFT. This approach seemed to take long.

I'm just wondering if there's any efficient way to do this? (Please note that at this stage, I'm not particular about the frequency resolution)

Source Link
SanVEE
  • 247
  • 1
  • 2
  • 9

What is the efficient way to perform FFT for large set of Samples?

I'm trying to perform FFT for large set of samples,


Sampling Rate : 1 MHZ

No. of Samples Captured : 1 Million (1 sec duration)


currently what I'm doing is, I've added zero padding so that it matches to 2^n, and now the total number of samples are 1048576 (2^20) and then I perform FFT. This approach seemed to take long.

I'm just wondering if there's any efficient way to do this? (Please note that at this stage, I'm not particular about the frequency resolution)

Many Thanks for your time..:)