Skip to main content
Copy edited.
Source Link
Peter Mortensen
  • 1.7k
  • 3
  • 17
  • 23

I use DipTrace, and I'm very satisfied. It's not free, but it is quite inexpensive. I tried EagleEAGLE, which seems to be the most widely used, but I was horrified about its unfriendliness. 

To me, it's not only a thing about learning curve, but simply making things harder to do than it should be. MadeIt made me remember a traumatic experience with AutoCADAutoCAD during the late 80s1980s. I tried many other low-cost and free alternatives, but they either were also a bad-UI, unstable, or had a poor component library. The only under-100s package that worked well was DipTrace. Its weakness is that the PCB router is not very efficient (it was unable to route some boards that I was able to route manually without much effort), in particular when you have few layers, but to my use this was a minor limitation in comparison.

I use DipTrace and I'm very satisfied. It's not free, but is quite inexpensive. I tried Eagle, which seems to be the most widely used, but was horrified about its unfriendliness. To me, it's not only a thing about learning curve, but simply making things harder to do than it should be. Made me remember a traumatic experience with AutoCAD during the late 80s. I tried many other low-cost and free alternatives, but they either were also a bad-UI, unstable, or had a poor component library. The only under-100s package that worked well was DipTrace. Its weakness is that the PCB router is not very efficient (it was unable to route some boards that I was able to route manually without much effort), in particular when you have few layers, but to my use this was a minor limitation in comparison.

I use DipTrace, and I'm very satisfied. It's not free, but it is quite inexpensive. I tried EAGLE, which seems to be the most widely used, but I was horrified about its unfriendliness. 

To me, it's not only a thing about learning curve, but simply making things harder to do than it should be. It made me remember a traumatic experience with AutoCAD during the late 1980s. I tried many other low-cost and free alternatives, but they either were also a bad-UI, unstable, or had a poor component library. The only under-100s package that worked well was DipTrace. Its weakness is that the PCB router is not very efficient (it was unable to route some boards that I was able to route manually without much effort), in particular when you have few layers, but to my use this was a minor limitation in comparison.

added 42 characters in body
Source Link
endolith
  • 29k
  • 24
  • 121
  • 184

I use DipTraceDipTrace and I'm very satisfied. It's not free, but is quite inexpensive. I tried Eagle, which seems to be the most widely used, but was horrified about its unfriendliness. To me, it's not only a thing about learning curve, but simply making things harder to do thantthan it should be. Made me remember a traumatic experience with AutoCAD during the late 80s. I tried many other low-cost and free alternatives, but they either were also a bad-UI, unstable, or had a poor component library. The only under-100s package that worked well was DipTrace. Its weakness is that the PCB router is not very efficient (it was unable to route some boards that I was able to route manually without much effort), in particular when you have few layers, but to my use this was a minor limitation in comparisioncomparison.

I use DipTrace and I'm very satisfied. It's not free, but is quite inexpensive. I tried Eagle, which seems to be the most widely used, but was horrified about its unfriendliness. To me, it's not only a thing about learning curve, but simply making things harder to do thant it should be. Made me remember a traumatic experience with AutoCAD during the late 80s. I tried many other low-cost and free alternatives, but they either were also a bad-UI, unstable, or had a poor component library. The only under-100s package that worked well was DipTrace. Its weakness is that the PCB router is not very efficient (it was unable to route some boards that I was able to route manually without much effort), in particular when you have few layers, but to my use this was a minor limitation in comparision.

I use DipTrace and I'm very satisfied. It's not free, but is quite inexpensive. I tried Eagle, which seems to be the most widely used, but was horrified about its unfriendliness. To me, it's not only a thing about learning curve, but simply making things harder to do than it should be. Made me remember a traumatic experience with AutoCAD during the late 80s. I tried many other low-cost and free alternatives, but they either were also a bad-UI, unstable, or had a poor component library. The only under-100s package that worked well was DipTrace. Its weakness is that the PCB router is not very efficient (it was unable to route some boards that I was able to route manually without much effort), in particular when you have few layers, but to my use this was a minor limitation in comparison.

deleted 1 characters in body
Source Link
fceconel
  • 2.7k
  • 22
  • 19

I use DipTrace and I'm very satisfied. It's not free, but is quite inexpensive. I tried Eagle, which seems to be the most widely used, but was horrified about it'sits unfriendliness. To me, it's not only a thing about learning curve, but simply making things harder to do thant it should be. Made me remember a traumatic experience with AutoCAD during the late 80s. I tried many other low-cost and free alternatives, but they either were also a bad-UI, unstable, or had a poor component library. The only under-100s package that worked well was DipTrace. Its weakness is that the PCB router is not very efficient (it was unable to route some boards that I was able to route manually without much effort), in particular when you have few layers, but to my use this was a minor limitation in comparision.

I use DipTrace and I'm very satisfied. It's not free, but is quite inexpensive. I tried Eagle, which seems to be the most widely used, but was horrified about it's unfriendliness. To me, it's not only a thing about learning curve, but simply making things harder to do thant it should be. Made me remember a traumatic experience with AutoCAD during the late 80s. I tried many other low-cost and free alternatives, but they either were also a bad-UI, unstable, or had a poor component library. The only under-100s package that worked well was DipTrace. Its weakness is that the PCB router is not very efficient (it was unable to route some boards that I was able to route manually without much effort), in particular when you have few layers, but to my use this was a minor limitation in comparision.

I use DipTrace and I'm very satisfied. It's not free, but is quite inexpensive. I tried Eagle, which seems to be the most widely used, but was horrified about its unfriendliness. To me, it's not only a thing about learning curve, but simply making things harder to do thant it should be. Made me remember a traumatic experience with AutoCAD during the late 80s. I tried many other low-cost and free alternatives, but they either were also a bad-UI, unstable, or had a poor component library. The only under-100s package that worked well was DipTrace. Its weakness is that the PCB router is not very efficient (it was unable to route some boards that I was able to route manually without much effort), in particular when you have few layers, but to my use this was a minor limitation in comparision.

Source Link
fceconel
  • 2.7k
  • 22
  • 19
Loading
Post Made Community Wiki