Skip to main content
Rollback to Revision 4
Source Link
Mark
  • 11.7k
  • 1
  • 33
  • 38

Real sinusoidsIt can't in reality.

A full answer would take an entire text book but the basic answer is:

In signal processing, signals are often discussed as a sum of complexcomplex sinusoids (\$e^{j\omega t}\$) because it'sits mathematically convenient.

This leads to Euler's formulaEuler's formula:

\$e^{j\omega t} = \cos(wt) + j \cdot \sin(\omega t)\$\$e^{j\omega t} = cos(wt) + j \cdot sin(\omega t)\$

Which leads to its inverse:

\$\cos(\omega t) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot (e^{j\omega t} + e^{-j\omega t})\$\$cos(\omega t) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot (e^{j\omega t} + e^{-j\omega t})\$

Which implies that both positive and negative frequency complex sinusoids areis present, which is where it pops up in signal processing discussion.

Real sinusoids can't in reality.

A full answer would take an entire text book but the basic answer is:

In signal processing, signals are often discussed as a sum of complex sinusoids (\$e^{j\omega t}\$) because it's mathematically convenient.

This leads to Euler's formula:

\$e^{j\omega t} = \cos(wt) + j \cdot \sin(\omega t)\$

Which leads to its inverse:

\$\cos(\omega t) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot (e^{j\omega t} + e^{-j\omega t})\$

Which implies that both positive and negative frequency complex sinusoids are present, which is where it pops up in signal processing discussion.

It can't in reality.

A full answer would take an entire text book but the basic answer is:

In signal processing signals are often discussed as a sum of complex sinusoids (\$e^{j\omega t}\$) because its mathematically convenient.

This leads to Euler's formula:

\$e^{j\omega t} = cos(wt) + j \cdot sin(\omega t)\$

Which leads to its inverse:

\$cos(\omega t) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot (e^{j\omega t} + e^{-j\omega t})\$

Which implies that both positive and negative frequency is present which is where it pops up in signal processing discussion.

clarify real vs complex sinusoids, fix typos
Source Link
endolith
  • 29k
  • 24
  • 121
  • 184

ItReal sinusoids can't in reality.

A full answer would take an entire text book but the basic answer is:

In signal processing, signals are often discussed as a sum of complexcomplex sinusoids (\$e^{j\omega t}\$) because itsit's mathematically convenient.

This leads to Euler's formulaEuler's formula:

\$e^{j\omega t} = cos(wt) + j \cdot sin(\omega t)\$\$e^{j\omega t} = \cos(wt) + j \cdot \sin(\omega t)\$

Which leads to its inverse:

\$cos(\omega t) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot (e^{j\omega t} + e^{-j\omega t})\$\$\cos(\omega t) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot (e^{j\omega t} + e^{-j\omega t})\$

Which implies that both positive and negative frequency iscomplex sinusoids are present, which is where it pops up in signal processing discussion.

It can't in reality.

A full answer would take an entire text book but the basic answer is:

In signal processing signals are often discussed as a sum of complex sinusoids (\$e^{j\omega t}\$) because its mathematically convenient.

This leads to Euler's formula:

\$e^{j\omega t} = cos(wt) + j \cdot sin(\omega t)\$

Which leads to its inverse:

\$cos(\omega t) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot (e^{j\omega t} + e^{-j\omega t})\$

Which implies that both positive and negative frequency is present which is where it pops up in signal processing discussion.

Real sinusoids can't in reality.

A full answer would take an entire text book but the basic answer is:

In signal processing, signals are often discussed as a sum of complex sinusoids (\$e^{j\omega t}\$) because it's mathematically convenient.

This leads to Euler's formula:

\$e^{j\omega t} = \cos(wt) + j \cdot \sin(\omega t)\$

Which leads to its inverse:

\$\cos(\omega t) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot (e^{j\omega t} + e^{-j\omega t})\$

Which implies that both positive and negative frequency complex sinusoids are present, which is where it pops up in signal processing discussion.

added 6 characters in body; added 4 characters in body
Source Link
Mark
  • 11.7k
  • 1
  • 33
  • 38

It can't in reality.

A full answer would take an entire text book but the basic answer is:

In signal processing signals are often discussed as a sum of complex sinusoids (\$e^{j\omega t}\$) because its mathematically convenient.

This leads to Euler's formula:

\$e^{j\omega t} = cos(wt) + j*sin(\omega t)\$\$e^{j\omega t} = cos(wt) + j \cdot sin(\omega t)\$

Which leads to its inverse:

\$cos(\omega t) = \frac{1}{2} * (e^{j\omega t} + e^{-j\omega t})\$\$cos(\omega t) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot (e^{j\omega t} + e^{-j\omega t})\$

Which implies that both positive and negative frequency is present which is where it pops up in signal processing discussion.

It can't in reality.

A full answer would take an entire text book but the basic answer is:

In signal processing signals are often discussed as a sum of complex sinusoids (\$e^{j\omega t}\$) because its mathematically convenient.

This leads to Euler's formula:

\$e^{j\omega t} = cos(wt) + j*sin(\omega t)\$

Which leads to its inverse:

\$cos(\omega t) = \frac{1}{2} * (e^{j\omega t} + e^{-j\omega t})\$

Which implies that both positive and negative frequency is present which is where it pops up in signal processing discussion.

It can't in reality.

A full answer would take an entire text book but the basic answer is:

In signal processing signals are often discussed as a sum of complex sinusoids (\$e^{j\omega t}\$) because its mathematically convenient.

This leads to Euler's formula:

\$e^{j\omega t} = cos(wt) + j \cdot sin(\omega t)\$

Which leads to its inverse:

\$cos(\omega t) = \frac{1}{2} \cdot (e^{j\omega t} + e^{-j\omega t})\$

Which implies that both positive and negative frequency is present which is where it pops up in signal processing discussion.

deleted 2 characters in body
Source Link
Mark
  • 11.7k
  • 1
  • 33
  • 38
Loading
fixing latex stuff
Source Link
Mark
  • 11.7k
  • 1
  • 33
  • 38
Loading
Source Link
Mark
  • 11.7k
  • 1
  • 33
  • 38
Loading