Timeline for Shortcircuited motorcycle alternator leads to RPM proportional losses?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2018 at 0:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackElectronix/status/1077715787773894657 | ||
| Oct 2, 2013 at 0:32 | answer | added | Peter Andrews | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 29, 2011 at 12:39 | history | edited | Kevin Vermeer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarification and principles of operation
|
| S Jun 29, 2011 at 12:39 | history | suggested | brainwash | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarification and principles of operation
|
| Jun 29, 2011 at 11:26 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 29, 2011 at 12:39 | |||||
| Jun 25, 2011 at 20:54 | comment | added | JustJeff | do they really put the windings on the rotor? | |
| Jun 25, 2011 at 19:48 | comment | added | brainwash | Yes, they do that exactly, it's USUALLY not a wound stator/ wound rotor like in cars but a permanent magnet stator and wound tri-phase rotor with P-P voltages of 80-200V. To bring the voltage down they shunt(?) the phases to common ground. Still looking for an answer to this one. | |
| Jun 21, 2011 at 0:58 | comment | added | JustJeff | so they regulate to 14.4 by just throwing extra load on the alternator, essentially just electrically bogging it down to get 14.4V? that does seem rather wasteful. | |
| Jun 21, 2011 at 0:56 | answer | added | JustJeff | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 21, 2011 at 0:32 | history | asked | brainwash | CC BY-SA 3.0 |