Timeline for Can the fake USB flash drive attack happen over Ethernet?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 25, 2015 at 16:43 | comment | added | Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams | @W5VO: You should definitely consider any piece of equipment you plug this into to be a complete loss. But it shouldn't affect devices plugged into the other ports. | |
Apr 25, 2015 at 16:34 | comment | added | W5VO | I'm not sure that the "quality equipment" argument works here in terms of protecting your ethernet port. The damage may be limited if the isolation holds, but if you have 120V across the signal transformer windings, I can't imagine them surviving for long. | |
Apr 25, 2015 at 2:43 | comment | added | Alistair Buxton | and before this there was the Blotto Box. | |
Apr 24, 2015 at 23:10 | comment | added | Criticize SE actions means ban | @sebleblanc which is why you plug in that end first. | |
Apr 24, 2015 at 1:55 | comment | added | sleblanc | If your switches can't handle simple loops, you should consider replacing your switches instead of frying equipment that does not belong to you. (even though that cable will probably not even affect the machine; it's more likely to shock the person handling the RJ45 bit) | |
Apr 23, 2015 at 22:25 | vote | accept | user3900751 | ||
Apr 23, 2015 at 21:49 | comment | added | Vladimir Cravero | +1 for the link. I always wanted an etherkiller, I administer part of the network at my university and people keep magin loops... that would teach them. | |
Apr 23, 2015 at 21:43 | comment | added | user3900751 | Wow that thing is scary | |
Apr 23, 2015 at 21:42 | history | answered | Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams | CC BY-SA 3.0 |