Skip to main content

Why is the CMRR of an op amp is-amp defined in such a way?

Why is the CMRRCMRR of an op amp-amp defined as \$20\log(A_d/A_c)\$?

I know that the value of \$A_d\$ is far greater than \$A_c\$, so we take the log, but why we are we multiplying 20 with it?

Why CMRR of an op amp is defined in such a way?

Why is the CMRR of an op amp defined as \$20\log(A_d/A_c)\$?

I know that the value of \$A_d\$ is far greater than \$A_c\$, so we take the log, but why we are multiplying 20 with it?

Why is the CMRR of an op-amp defined in such a way?

Why is the CMRR of an op-amp defined as \$20\log(A_d/A_c)\$?

I know that the value of \$A_d\$ is far greater than \$A_c\$, so we take the log, but why are we multiplying 20 with it?

added 14 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Null
  • 7.7k
  • 17
  • 37
  • 48

Why CMRR of an OPAMPop amp is defined in such a way?

Why is the CMRR of an OPAMP isop amp defined as 20log(Ad/Ac)\$20\log(A_d/A_c)\$?

I know that the value of Ad\$A_d\$ is far greater tha Acthan \$A_c\$, so we take the log  , but why we are multiplying 20 with it?

`

Why CMRR of an OPAMP is defined in such a way?

Why CMRR of an OPAMP is defined as 20log(Ad/Ac)?

I know that the value of Ad is far greater tha Ac , so we take the log  , but why we are multiplying 20 with it?

`

Why CMRR of an op amp is defined in such a way?

Why is the CMRR of an op amp defined as \$20\log(A_d/A_c)\$?

I know that the value of \$A_d\$ is far greater than \$A_c\$, so we take the log, but why we are multiplying 20 with it?

Source Link

Why CMRR of an OPAMP is defined in such a way?

Why CMRR of an OPAMP is defined as 20log(Ad/Ac)?

I know that the value of Ad is far greater tha Ac , so we take the log , but why we are multiplying 20 with it?

`