Timeline for Antenna Performance with plastic fasten
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2015 at 13:57 | vote | accept | progloverfan | ||
| Nov 18, 2015 at 13:52 | comment | added | Andy aka | Matt is quite correct - I'm not going to stick my neck out to agree to any of this madness - if you believe the dipole works ok flat then it's because you've tested it and it works to your satisfaction (you believe). If you have tested it then test it with a plastic disc. If you haven't tested it to prove it works against a ground plane then listen to what I'm saying. | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 13:50 | comment | added | Matt Young | @progloverfan You're missing the point. It's the wrong tool for the job, so your fastener should be the least of your worries. | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 13:49 | comment | added | progloverfan | Ok Andy, in terms of performance it shouldn't but actually it could be used in this way (thanks for clarification). In any way what you think about the fasten ? | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 13:46 | history | edited | Andy aka | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 393 characters in body
|
| Nov 18, 2015 at 13:44 | comment | added | Andy aka | @progloverfan It makes no difference, a dipole shouldn't be used this way either. | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 13:42 | comment | added | progloverfan | Thanks Andy, but this picture is referential is supposed to be a dipole antenna. I have omitted that info sorry. I'll update the topic. | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 13:40 | history | answered | Andy aka | CC BY-SA 3.0 |