Skip to main content

Timeline for Why the integral is zero

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

20 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 6, 2015 at 2:33 history tweeted twitter.com/StackElectronix/status/673329442677239808
Dec 5, 2015 at 14:27 history reopened AndrejaKo
Null
Chris Stratton
Dave Tweed
Dec 4, 2015 at 7:53 vote accept user59419
Dec 4, 2015 at 5:29 history edited Null CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 character in body
Dec 3, 2015 at 22:14 review Reopen votes
Dec 5, 2015 at 14:27
Dec 3, 2015 at 19:19 history closed efox29
Daniel Grillo
PeterJ
JRE
Matt Young
Not suitable for this site
Dec 3, 2015 at 19:09 answer added Peter Green timeline score: 0
Dec 3, 2015 at 14:53 answer added walljam7 timeline score: 4
S Dec 3, 2015 at 12:57 history suggested Trang Oul CC BY-SA 3.0
LaTeX formatting
Dec 3, 2015 at 12:12 review Suggested edits
S Dec 3, 2015 at 12:57
Dec 3, 2015 at 9:12 answer added FMarazzi timeline score: 6
Dec 3, 2015 at 9:07 answer added Arsenal timeline score: 3
Dec 3, 2015 at 8:40 comment added user59419 No. there is no \$\frac{1}{T}\$. If \$\frac{1}{T}\$ is present it makes sense and I have seen it in various places.
Dec 3, 2015 at 8:37 review Close votes
Dec 3, 2015 at 19:22
Dec 3, 2015 at 8:34 comment added Chu Do you mean \$ \frac{1}{T}\int ...\$?
Dec 3, 2015 at 8:23 comment added user59419 Absolutely not. This estimation is used in all communication system and is not pure math question since in terms of mathematics only this integral is not always zero
Dec 3, 2015 at 8:22 comment added efox29 I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it does not relate to electronics and is a pure math based question, and so should belong on math.stackexchange.com
Dec 3, 2015 at 8:20 history edited user59419 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 12 characters in body
Dec 3, 2015 at 8:18 review Low quality posts
Dec 3, 2015 at 8:22
Dec 3, 2015 at 7:58 history asked user59419 CC BY-SA 3.0