Timeline for Altium : How to design a width rule for a subset of a net?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Dec 1, 2020 at 15:12 | history | suggested | pfabri | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Revived dead link
|
| Dec 1, 2020 at 12:56 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 1, 2020 at 15:12 | |||||
| Jan 4, 2016 at 10:12 | vote | accept | Julien | ||
| Jan 3, 2016 at 18:25 | comment | added | Tom L. | That would be too easy ;-). Yet, experience has shown that for 90% of the cases where you need them, basically 3 or 4 different sizes are enough. | |
| Jan 3, 2016 at 17:51 | comment | added | Julien | Net ties, really interesting. Would be cool to be able to resize each of them directly on the PCB... | |
| Jan 3, 2016 at 13:48 | comment | added | Tom L. | No, the Neck-Down rule only applies to pad entries, not to tracks themselves. You will need to scope the Routing -> Width rule to your desired values. Even if you set up a Neck-Down rule you would still get the width rule violations. | |
| Jan 3, 2016 at 13:31 | comment | added | Armandas | Would a Neck-Down rule be of any help here? techdocs.altium.com/display/ADRR/… | |
| Jan 3, 2016 at 13:29 | history | answered | Tom L. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |