Skip to main content
added math jax
Source Link
Null
  • 7.7k
  • 17
  • 37
  • 48

Why is stepping up voltage during transmission considers \$H=I^2\$I^2 R\$ but not \$H=\frac\$\frac{V^2}{R}\$?

During the transmission, the generated electric power is delivered after stepping up to hundreds of thousands or even more voltages by transformers.

In that case since \$P=I\cdot V\$, increasing \$V\$ reduces \$I\$ in the secondary of the transformer.

The reason given is to reduce \$P_{loss}=I^2R\$\$P_{\text{loss}}=I^2R\$ losses. Here \$I\$ decreases so the power loss.

Is that the real reason to step up?

I'm asking because we can write the power loss equation as:

\$P_{loss}=\frac{V^2}{R}\$\$P_{\text{loss}}=\frac{V^2}{R}\$

Or if we use both \$I\$ and \$V\$ in the power equation:

\$P_{loss}=I\cdot V\$\$P_{\text{loss}}=I\cdot V\$

It seems like if we step up the voltage \$I\$ decreases but \$V\$ increases. How about the power loss?

Does the power loss decrease? Or the real reason to step-up the voltage is to reduce the cross section area of the transmission lines significantly?

Why is stepping up voltage during transmission considers \$H=I^2 R\$ but not \$H=\frac{V^2}{R}\$?

During the transmission, the generated electric power is delivered after stepping up to hundreds of thousands or even more voltages by transformers.

In that case since \$P=I\cdot V\$, increasing \$V\$ reduces \$I\$ in the secondary of the transformer.

The reason given is to reduce \$P_{loss}=I^2R\$ losses. Here \$I\$ decreases so the power loss.

Is that the real reason to step up?

I'm asking because we can write the power loss equation as:

\$P_{loss}=\frac{V^2}{R}\$

Or if we use both \$I\$ and \$V\$ in the power equation:

\$P_{loss}=I\cdot V\$

It seems like if we step up the voltage \$I\$ decreases but \$V\$ increases. How about the power loss?

Does the power loss decrease? Or the real reason to step-up the voltage is to reduce the cross section area of the transmission lines significantly?

Why stepping up voltage during transmission considers \$I^2 R\$ but not \$\frac{V^2}{R}\$?

During the transmission, the generated electric power is delivered after stepping up to hundreds of thousands or even more voltages by transformers.

In that case since \$P=I\cdot V\$, increasing \$V\$ reduces \$I\$ in the secondary of the transformer.

The reason given is to reduce \$P_{\text{loss}}=I^2R\$ losses. Here \$I\$ decreases so the power loss.

Is that the real reason to step up?

I'm asking because we can write the power loss equation as:

\$P_{\text{loss}}=\frac{V^2}{R}\$

Or if we use both \$I\$ and \$V\$ in the power equation:

\$P_{\text{loss}}=I\cdot V\$

It seems like if we step up the voltage \$I\$ decreases but \$V\$ increases. How about the power loss?

Does the power loss decrease? Or the real reason to step-up the voltage is to reduce the cross section area of the transmission lines significantly?

Why is stepping up voltage during transmission considers I^2*R\$H=I^2 R\$ but not V^2/\$H=\frac{V^2}{R}\$?

During the transmission, the generated electric power is delivered after stepping up to hundreds of thousands or even more voltages by transformers.

In that case since P = I*V\$P=I\cdot V\$, increasing V\$V\$ reduces I\$I\$ in the secondary of the transformer.

The reason given is to reduce Ploss = I^2*R\$P_{loss}=I^2R\$ losses. Here I\$I\$ decreases so the power loss.

Is that the real reason to step up?

I'm asking because we can write the power loss equation as:

Ploss = V^2/R\$P_{loss}=\frac{V^2}{R}\$

Or if we use both I\$I\$ and V\$V\$ in the power equation:

Ploss = (V/R)*I\$P_{loss}=I\cdot V\$

It seems like if we step up the voltage I\$I\$ decreases but V\$V\$ increases. How about the power loss?

Does the power loss decrease? Or the real reason to step-up the voltage is to reduce the cross section area of the transmission lines significantly?

Why is stepping up voltage during transmission considers I^2*R but not V^2/R?

During the transmission, the generated electric power is delivered after stepping up to hundreds of thousands or even more voltages by transformers.

In that case since P = I*V, increasing V reduces I in the secondary of the transformer.

The reason given is to reduce Ploss = I^2*R losses. Here I decreases so the power loss.

Is that the real reason to step up?

I'm asking because we can write the power loss equation as:

Ploss = V^2/R

Or if we use both I and V in the power equation:

Ploss = (V/R)*I

It seems like if we step up the voltage I decreases but V increases. How about the power loss?

Does the power loss decrease? Or the real reason to step-up the voltage is to reduce the cross section area of the transmission lines significantly?

Why is stepping up voltage during transmission considers \$H=I^2 R\$ but not \$H=\frac{V^2}{R}\$?

During the transmission, the generated electric power is delivered after stepping up to hundreds of thousands or even more voltages by transformers.

In that case since \$P=I\cdot V\$, increasing \$V\$ reduces \$I\$ in the secondary of the transformer.

The reason given is to reduce \$P_{loss}=I^2R\$ losses. Here \$I\$ decreases so the power loss.

Is that the real reason to step up?

I'm asking because we can write the power loss equation as:

\$P_{loss}=\frac{V^2}{R}\$

Or if we use both \$I\$ and \$V\$ in the power equation:

\$P_{loss}=I\cdot V\$

It seems like if we step up the voltage \$I\$ decreases but \$V\$ increases. How about the power loss?

Does the power loss decrease? Or the real reason to step-up the voltage is to reduce the cross section area of the transmission lines significantly?

Tweeted twitter.com/StackElectronix/status/742196833611612160
Source Link
user16307
  • 12.2k
  • 53
  • 192
  • 324

Why is stepping up voltage during transmission considers I^2*R but not V^2/R?

During the transmission, the generated electric power is delivered after stepping up to hundreds of thousands or even more voltages by transformers.

In that case since P = I*V, increasing V reduces I in the secondary of the transformer.

The reason given is to reduce Ploss = I^2*R losses. Here I decreases so the power loss.

Is that the real reason to step up?

I'm asking because we can write the power loss equation as:

Ploss = V^2/R

Or if we use both I and V in the power equation:

Ploss = (V/R)*I

It seems like if we step up the voltage I decreases but V increases. How about the power loss?

Does the power loss decrease? Or the real reason to step-up the voltage is to reduce the cross section area of the transmission lines significantly?