Timeline for Transformer: Double primary winding?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2016 at 14:17 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackElectronix/status/752144758362017796 | ||
| Jul 9, 2016 at 16:42 | vote | accept | RWIN | ||
| S Jul 8, 2016 at 16:39 | history | suggested | Peter Mortensen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Copy edited (e.g. ref. <http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/4645/is-it-ever-correct-to-have-a-space-before-a-question-or-exclamation-mark#comment206109_4645>).
|
| Jul 8, 2016 at 16:14 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 8, 2016 at 16:39 | |||||
| Jul 8, 2016 at 13:24 | comment | added | user16324 | About 1/5 of the amplitude, some loss of bass and treble, and the ability to drive a lower impedance load. It's quite common for PA systems to send 100V audio signals round a building, with a transformer like this built into every speaker. Search for "100V line PA" for more... | |
| Jul 8, 2016 at 13:07 | comment | added | RWIN | Wow ! Such a quick feedback from all of you ! Thanks ! If I put the same AC signal on both primary windings (something like sound for example), what am I getting at the output of the transformer ? | |
| Jul 8, 2016 at 13:03 | answer | added | Simon B | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 8, 2016 at 13:03 | answer | added | dim | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 8, 2016 at 13:02 | answer | added | Neil_UK | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 8, 2016 at 13:01 | comment | added | user16324 | You can wire them in series for 230V or parallel for 115V, and sell the same product in either domain. In parallel, you are correct, you lower the impedance, reducing resistance and therefore wasted power. | |
| Jul 8, 2016 at 12:57 | history | asked | RWIN | CC BY-SA 3.0 |