Timeline for Word or phrase to describe how frequently a value is measured
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2016 at 21:39 | comment | added | iheanyi | The downvote is pretty much because I don't think this answers the question. Courtesy when downvoting is to say why, so someone has a chance to address the issue in their answer (or defend it and change the downvoter's mind). | |
| Jul 29, 2016 at 21:32 | comment | added | dim | Well, it doesn't make sense to me. But I'm not going to argue anyway. And to be frank, I find it quite disappointing that such a trivial thing attracts so many upvotes. So I can easily accept as many downvotes you'd want on that (although not for the reason you give, but let's move on...). | |
| Jul 29, 2016 at 20:37 | comment | added | iheanyi | Huh, time to sample can't just be ignored. Anyway, the question mentions writing software for instrumentation. Clearly, the OP already understands sampling terminology, so this question is not asking what you thought. As for what I think it's called, you can read my answer and the OP's comment on it. | |
| Jul 29, 2016 at 18:16 | comment | added | dim | @iheanyi how would you call it then? Note: the time to actually sample the valu wasn't specified by OP and can therefore considered null. And this is really an implementation detail. Not relevant here. | |
| Jul 29, 2016 at 17:14 | comment | added | iheanyi | Downvoted: Time between measurements is not a sampling period. Period = sampling time + time until next measurement. The term for the latter is the OP's query. | |
| Jul 28, 2016 at 13:32 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Jul 28, 2016 at 14:01 | |||||
| Jul 28, 2016 at 13:16 | history | answered | dim | CC BY-SA 3.0 |