Timeline for Remagnetizing a BLDC magnet from a floppy drive
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2016 at 0:55 | history | edited | jonk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
extended the description, substantially; added 23 characters in body
|
| Aug 7, 2016 at 0:49 | history | edited | jonk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
extended the description, substantially
|
| Aug 7, 2016 at 0:02 | history | edited | jonk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body
|
| Aug 6, 2016 at 22:56 | comment | added | jonk | @pipe: Thanks. That's clearer to me, now. I'll see about adding the extra effort, as you indicate I should (and your comment makes good sense to me now.) I'm out to chop wood for a bit, then back in. Will try and get it done soon. | |
| Aug 6, 2016 at 22:51 | comment | added | pipe | The only question to ask is: "Does this post answer the question even if the link is dead?". In this case it obviously doesn't, and the link is dead to me. I think it's using some crazy ad-enforcing javascript based redirection. If the link contains answers, you can summarize them - you don't have to do the actual research. | |
| Aug 6, 2016 at 22:48 | comment | added | jonk | @pip: Thanks. So are you thinking about me doing research on some specific neodymium magnets, their field intensities at distances, and forming some quantitative magnetic field and non-Coulumb electric field calculations here? Or just deleting the answer. If the first, I've got too much else to do. If the latter, that's fine. Mostly curious, as I'm only still struggling to understand what's fine and not fine here. Or did you mean something else? | |
| Aug 6, 2016 at 22:45 | comment | added | pipe | Link-only answers is frowned upon here, please add the necessary information to the actual answer. | |
| Aug 6, 2016 at 22:41 | history | answered | jonk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |