Timeline for Is it 'ok' to have electrostatic sensitive components on an end-user, exposed PCB design?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 8, 2016 at 0:26 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackElectronix/status/795784491499397120 | ||
Nov 3, 2016 at 22:50 | comment | added | LorenzoDonati4Ukraine-OnStrike | @jonk Yep! Indeed! Especially against aliens (or the NSA) using the infamous Extra-Sensory Detection technology! :-D | |
Nov 3, 2016 at 22:37 | comment | added | jonk | @LorenzoDonati ;) They are often used in conjunction with tin foil hats! | |
Nov 3, 2016 at 22:33 | comment | added | LorenzoDonati4Ukraine-OnStrike | @jonk: I understand it's a typo, but thinking of mental cans to protect ESD sensitive device is really hilarious! You made my day, man! :-D | |
Nov 3, 2016 at 20:38 | vote | accept | Izzo | ||
Nov 3, 2016 at 20:33 | answer | added | Bimpelrekkie | timeline score: 5 | |
Nov 3, 2016 at 20:19 | history | edited | Izzo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Nov 3, 2016 at 20:08 | comment | added | jonk | Consider that these components are tied into other components with multiple, tiny protection diodes, resistors, capacitors, etc., all tied into the same nodes. It's also difficult to reach or touch certain areas, too. If you have any really high impedance nodes, even getting close can be a problem. But often, then adding static zap or efield protection to those nodes ruins their performance, too. So in some cases you'll see mental cans soldered around those areas. Use your judgment but also do some testing and make adjustments when you find problems. | |
Nov 3, 2016 at 19:55 | comment | added | DerStrom8 | Yes, any board seen by the customer that has ESD-sensitive devices should have ESD protection on it. ESD protection is usually done using TVS diodes | |
Nov 3, 2016 at 19:55 | answer | added | D.A.S. | timeline score: 3 | |
Nov 3, 2016 at 19:43 | history | asked | Izzo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |