Timeline for Do current / power monitoring ICs (e.g. INA219) allow frequent re-reading?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2017 at 22:34 | vote | accept | Polynomial | ||
| Jan 11, 2017 at 16:13 | answer | added | user | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 18, 2016 at 0:52 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackElectronix/status/799415056693862400 | ||
| Nov 17, 2016 at 11:22 | history | edited | Polynomial | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
maths whoops
|
| Nov 17, 2016 at 11:21 | comment | added | Polynomial | @AliChen You're right, I was tired when I wrote this. | |
| Nov 17, 2016 at 1:46 | comment | added | Ale..chenski | how did you get 3000 samples/s out of 538 us conversion rate? I got about 1800 s/s... and if you want to get computed power, it will be at least half of that. | |
| Nov 17, 2016 at 1:04 | comment | added | D.A.S. | This IC is flexible with tradeoffs between 12bit rates thru to 9 bit rates. 1st define your requirements then make your choices and iterate specs until you have all your requirements and priorities clearly understood. again define 1st= Cost vs performance vs functions.... Looking at the datasheet example -15dB at 3kHz an additional filter is needed to meet your SNR spec | |
| Nov 16, 2016 at 23:38 | history | asked | Polynomial | CC BY-SA 3.0 |